mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning unitaries with quantum statistical queries

arXiv 2310.02254 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2023quant-ph cs.CC cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose several algorithms for learning unitary operators from quantum statistical queries with respect to their Choi-Jamiolkowski state. Quantum statistical queries capture the capabilities of a learner with limited quantum resources, which receives as input only noisy estimates of expected values of measurements. Our approach leverages quantum statistical queries to estimate the Fourier mass of a unitary on a subset of Pauli strings, generalizing previous techniques developed for uniform quantum examples. Specifically, we show that the celebrated quantum Goldreich-Levin algorithm can be implemented with quantum statistical queries, whereas the prior version of the algorithm involves oracle access to the unitary and its inverse. As an application, we prove that quantum Boolean functions with constant total influence or with constant degree are efficiently learnable in our model. Moreover, we prove that O(log n)-juntas are efficiently learnable and constant-depth circuits are learnable query-efficiently with quantum statistical queries. On the other hand, all previous algorithms for these tasks demand significantly greater resources, such as oracle access to the unitary or direct access to the Choi-Jamiolkowski state. We also demonstrate that, despite these positive results, quantum statistical queries lead to an exponentially larger query complexity for certain tasks, compared to separable measurements to the Choi-Jamiolkowski state. In particular, we show an exponential lower bound for learning a class of phase-oracle unitaries and a double exponential lower bound for testing the unitarity of channels. Taken together, our results indicate that quantum statistical queries offer a unified framework for various unitary learning tasks, with potential applications in quantum machine learning, many-body physics and benchmarking of near-term devices.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.

Builds on

16 of 84 references.

References · 16

  1. 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
  2. 2020Quantum noise protects quantum classifiers against adversariescited by 68
  3. 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 50
  4. 2022Out-of-distribution generalization for learning quantum dynamicscited by 49
  5. 2022Classical surrogates for quantum learning modelscited by 39
  6. 2022Learning to predict arbitrary quantum processescited by 34
  7. 2023Shadows of quantum machine learningcited by 31
  8. 2022Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer Matrixcited by 22
  9. 2020Quantum statistical query learningcited by 19
  10. 2022Quantum Local Differential Privacy and Quantum Statistical Query Modelcited by 12
  11. 2022Optimal algorithms for learning quantum phase statescited by 10
  12. 2019Quantum Learning Boolean Linear Functions w.r.t. Product Distributionscited by 9
4 more
  1. 2023On the average-case complexity of learning output distributions of quantum circuitscited by 9
  2. 2021On the Hardness of PAC-learning Stabilizer States with Noisecited by 8
  3. 2023Classical Verification of Quantum Learningcited by 6
  4. 2023On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

5 papers.