mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fair SA: Sensitivity Analysis for Fairness in Face Recognition

arXiv 2202.03586 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the use of deep learning in high impact domains becomes ubiquitous, it is increasingly important to assess the resilience of models. One such high impact domain is that of face recognition, with real world applications involving images affected by various degradations, such as motion blur or high exposure. Moreover, images captured across different attributes, such as gender and race, can also challenge the robustness of a face recognition algorithm. While traditional summary statistics suggest that the aggregate performance of face recognition models has continued to improve, these metrics do not directly measure the robustness or fairness of the models. Visual Psychophysics Sensitivity Analysis (VPSA) [1] provides a way to pinpoint the individual causes of failure by way of introducing incremental perturbations in the data. However, perturbations may affect subgroups differently. In this paper, we propose a new fairness evaluation based on robustness in the form of a generic framework that extends VPSA. With this framework, we can analyze the ability of a model to perform fairly for different subgroups of a population affected by perturbations, and pinpoint the exact failure modes for a subgroup by measuring targeted robustness. With the increasing focus on the fairness of models, we use face recognition as an example application of our framework and propose to compactly visualize the fairness analysis of a model via AUC matrices. We analyze the performance of common face recognition models and empirically show that certain subgroups are at a disadvantage when images are perturbed, thereby uncovering trends that were not visible using the model's performance on subgroups without perturbations.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.

Builds on

16 of 30 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  2. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 911
  3. 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
  4. 2020Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditingcited by 89
  5. 2019Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?cited by 56
  6. 2020Fairness Through Robustness: Investigating Robustness Disparity in Deep Learningcited by 55
  7. 2019Characterizing the Variability in Face Recognition Accuracy Relative to Racecited by 40
  8. 2020FairFace Challenge at ECCV 2020: Analyzing Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 26
  9. 2016How Image Degradations Affect Deep CNN-based Face Recognition?cited by 20
  10. 2017Strengths and Weaknesses of Deep Learning Models for Face Recognition Against Image Degradationscited by 19
  11. 2018Visual Psychophysics for Making Face Recognition Algorithms More Explainablecited by 19
  12. 2016PsyPhy: A Psychophysics Driven Evaluation Framework for Visual Recognitioncited by 18
4 more
  1. 2018Psychlab: A Psychology Laboratory for Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 14
  2. 2021FACESEC: A Fine-grained Robustness Evaluation Framework for Face Recognition Systemscited by 14
  3. 2018Recognizing Disguised Faces in the Wildcited by 7
  4. 2019SeesawFaceNets: sparse and robust face verification model for mobile platformcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

11 papers.