mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Audio Deepfake Detection Based on a Combination of F0 Information and Real Plus Imaginary Spectrogram Features

arXiv 2208.01214 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2022cs.SD cs.LG eess.AScited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, pioneer research works have proposed a large number of acoustic features (log power spectrogram, linear frequency cepstral coefficients, constant Q cepstral coefficients, etc.) for audio deepfake detection, obtaining good performance, and showing that different subbands have different contributions to audio deepfake detection. However, this lacks an explanation of the specific information in the subband, and these features also lose information such as phase. Inspired by the mechanism of synthetic speech, the fundamental frequency (F0) information is used to improve the quality of synthetic speech, while the F0 of synthetic speech is still too average, which differs significantly from that of real speech. It is expected that F0 can be used as important information to discriminate between bonafide and fake speech, while this information cannot be used directly due to the irregular distribution of F0. Insteadly, the frequency band containing most of F0 is selected as the input feature. Meanwhile, to make full use of the phase and full-band information, we also propose to use real and imaginary spectrogram features as complementary input features and model the disjoint subbands separately. Finally, the results of F0, real and imaginary spectrogram features are fused. Experimental results on the ASVspoof 2019 LA dataset show that our proposed system is very effective for the audio deepfake detection task, achieving an equivalent error rate (EER) of 0.43%, which surpasses almost all systems.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2022.

Builds on

17 of 38 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  2. 2020FastSpeech 2: Fast and High-Quality End-to-End Text to Speechcited by 717
  3. 2019ASVspoof 2019: Future Horizons in Spoofed and Fake Audio Detectioncited by 178
  4. 2020End-to-end anti-spoofing with RawNet2cited by 164
  5. 2021ASVspoof 2021: accelerating progress in spoofed and deepfake speech detectioncited by 161
  6. 2020FastPitch: Parallel Text-to-speech with Pitch Predictioncited by 151
  7. 2022ADD 2022: the First Audio Deep Synthesis Detection Challengecited by 96
  8. 2019STC Antispoofing Systems for the ASVspoof2019 Challengecited by 51
  9. 2021Investigating self-supervised front ends for speech spoofing countermeasurescited by 46
  10. 2020F0-consistent many-to-many non-parallel voice conversion via conditional autoencodercited by 35
  11. 2022FullSubNet+: Channel Attention FullSubNet with Complex Spectrograms for Speech Enhancementcited by 29
  12. 2021Explaining deep learning models for spoofing and deepfake detection with SHapley Additive exPlanationscited by 13
5 more
  1. 2020Spoofing Attack Detection using the Non-linear Fusion of Sub-band Classifierscited by 9
  2. 2019Ensemble Models for Spoofing Detection in Automatic Speaker Verificationcited by 8
  3. 2021RW-Resnet: A Novel Speech Anti-Spoofing Model Using Raw Waveformcited by 4
  4. 2020Subband modeling for spoofing detection in automatic speaker verificationcited by 3
  5. 2021Towards end-to-end F0 voice conversion based on Dual-GAN with convolutional wavelet kernelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

9 papers.