mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Calibrate: Interactive Analysis of Probabilistic Model Output

arXiv 2207.13770 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2022cs.HC cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Analyzing classification model performance is a crucial task for machine learning practitioners. While practitioners often use count-based metrics derived from confusion matrices, like accuracy, many applications, such as weather prediction, sports betting, or patient risk prediction, rely on a classifier's predicted probabilities rather than predicted labels. In these instances, practitioners are concerned with producing a calibrated model, that is, one which outputs probabilities that reflect those of the true distribution. Model calibration is often analyzed visually, through static reliability diagrams, however, the traditional calibration visualization may suffer from a variety of drawbacks due to the strong aggregations it necessitates. Furthermore, count-based approaches are unable to sufficiently analyze model calibration. We present Calibrate, an interactive reliability diagram that addresses the aforementioned issues. Calibrate constructs a reliability diagram that is resistant to drawbacks in traditional approaches, and allows for interactive subgroup analysis and instance-level inspection. We demonstrate the utility of Calibrate through use cases on both real-world and synthetic data. We further validate Calibrate by presenting the results of a think-aloud experiment with data scientists who routinely analyze model calibration.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2022.

Builds on

15 of 51 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 664
  3. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  4. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 446
  5. 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 246
  6. 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 168
  7. 2018Visual Analytics in Deep Learning: An Interrogative Survey for the Next Frontierscited by 117
  8. 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
  9. 2019Calibration tests in multi-class classification: A unifying frameworkcited by 79
  10. 2017ActiVis: Visual Exploration of Industry-Scale Deep Neural Network Modelscited by 56
  11. 2020Boxer: Interactive Comparison of Classifier Resultscited by 28
  12. 2020Evaluating probabilistic classifiers: Reliability diagrams and score decompositions revisitedcited by 26
3 more
  1. 2021Neo: Generalizing Confusion Matrix Visualization to Hierarchical and Multi-Output Labelscited by 17
  2. 2019ConfusionFlow: A model-agnostic visualization for temporal analysis of classifier confusioncited by 15
  3. 2021Histogram binning revisited with a focus on human perceptioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.