mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Modelling non-reinforced preferences using selective attention

arXiv 2207.13699 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How can artificial agents learn non-reinforced preferences to continuously adapt their behaviour to a changing environment? We decompose this question into two challenges: (i) encoding diverse memories and (ii) selectively attending to these for preference formation. Our proposed non-reinforced preference learning mechanism using selective attention, textscNore, addresses both by leveraging the agent's world model to collect a diverse set of experiences which are interleaved with imagined roll-outs to encode memories. These memories are selectively attended to, using attention and gating blocks, to update agent's preferences. We validate textscNore in a modified OpenAI Gym FrozenLake environment (without any external signal) with and without volatility under a fixed model of the environment -- and compare its behaviour to textscPepper, a Hebbian preference learning mechanism. We demonstrate that textscNore provides a straightforward framework to induce exploratory preferences in the absence of external signals.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2022.

Builds on

19 of 44 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  4. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,653
  5. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,264
  6. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
  7. 2020Mastering Atari with Discrete World Modelscited by 1,007
  8. 2020Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World Modelscited by 368
  9. 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 267
  10. 2020RIDE: Rewarding Impact-Driven Exploration for Procedurally-Generated Environmentscited by 135
  11. 2018Model-Based Active Explorationcited by 105
  12. 2020Active inference on discrete state-spaces: a synthesiscited by 92
7 more
  1. 2020Deep active inference agents using Monte-Carlo methodscited by 72
  2. 2020Ready Policy One: World Building Through Active Learningcited by 33
  3. 2021Exploration and preference satisfaction trade-off in reward-free learningcited by 12
  4. 2019Scheduled Intrinsic Drive: A Hierarchical Take on Intrinsically Motivated Explorationcited by 11
  5. 2021Active inference, Bayesian optimal design, and expected utilitycited by 6
  6. 2022Geometric Methods for Sampling, Optimisation, Inference and Adaptive Agentscited by 5
  7. 2022Reclaiming saliency: rhythmic precision-modulated action and perceptioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AdaMem: Learning What to Remember with Adaptive Memory Policies for Personalized Agents
  2. 2026Aligning to Illusions: Choice Blindness in Human and AI Feedback
  3. 2026Learning Personalized Agents from Human Feedback
  4. 2026Learning the Preferences of a Learning Agent
  5. 2026Learning How and What to Memorize: Cognition-Inspired Two-Stage Optimization for Evolving Memory
  6. 2025Preference-Aware Memory Update for Long-Term LLM Agents
  7. 2026Beyond Uniform Forgetting: A Study of Sequential Direct Preference Optimization Across Preference Settings
  8. 2025CLARIFY: Contrastive Preference Reinforcement Learning for Untangling Ambiguous Queries