Scheduled Intrinsic Drive: A Hierarchical Take on Intrinsically Motivated Exploration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Exploration in sparse reward reinforcement learning remains an open challenge. Many state-of-the-art methods use intrinsic motivation to complement the sparse extrinsic reward signal, giving the agent more opportunities to receive feedback during exploration. Commonly these signals are added as bonus rewards, which results in a mixture policy that neither conducts exploration nor task fulfillment resolutely. In this paper, we instead learn separate intrinsic and extrinsic task policies and schedule between these different drives to accelerate exploration and stabilize learning. Moreover, we introduce a new type of intrinsic reward denoted as successor feature control (SFC), which is general and not task-specific. It takes into account statistics over complete trajectories and thus differs from previous methods that only use local information to evaluate intrinsic motivation. We evaluate our proposed scheduled intrinsic drive (SID) agent using three different environments with pure visual inputs: VizDoom, DeepMind Lab and DeepMind Control Suite. The results show a substantially improved exploration efficiency with SFC and the hierarchical usage of the intrinsic drives. A video of our experimental results can be found at https://youtu.be/b0MbY3lUlEI.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: From Single-Agent to Multiagent Domaincited by 57
- 2021MADE: Exploration via Maximizing Deviation from Explored Regionscited by 40
- 2021Successor Feature Landmarks for Long-Horizon Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
- 2021Don't Do What Doesn't Matter: Intrinsic Motivation with Action Usefulnesscited by 7
- 2024World Models with Hints of Large Language Models for Goal Achievingcited by 6
- 2021Co-Imitation Learning without Expert Demonstrationcited by 2
- 2021Learning What to Memorize: Using Intrinsic Motivation to Form Useful Memory in Partially Observable Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2022Image Augmentation Based Momentum Memory Intrinsic Reward for Sparse Reward Visual Scenescited by 1
- 2022Modelling non-reinforced preferences using selective attentioncited by 1
- 2023Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Latent Landmark Graphscited by 1
- 2021Delayed Rewards Calibration via Reward Empirical Sufficiencycited by 0
- 2024World Models with Hints of Large Language Models for Goal Achieving11 Jun 2024
- 2023Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Latent Landmark Graphs22 Jul 2023
- 2022Modelling non-reinforced preferences using selective attention25 Jul 2022
- 2022Image Augmentation Based Momentum Memory Intrinsic Reward for Sparse Reward Visual Scenes19 May 2022
- 2021Successor Feature Landmarks for Long-Horizon Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning18 Nov 2021
- 2021Learning What to Memorize: Using Intrinsic Motivation to Form Useful Memory in Partially Observable Reinforcement Learning25 Oct 2021
- 2021Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: From Single-Agent to Multiagent Domain14 Sep 2021
- 2021MADE: Exploration via Maximizing Deviation from Explored Regions18 Jun 2021
- 2021Don't Do What Doesn't Matter: Intrinsic Motivation with Action Usefulness20 May 2021
- 2021Co-Imitation Learning without Expert Demonstration27 Mar 2021
- 2021Delayed Rewards Calibration via Reward Empirical Sufficiency21 Feb 2021