mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Network Revenue Management with Demand Learning and Fair Resource-Consumption Balancing

arXiv 2207.11159 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2022stat.ML cs.CY cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In addition to maximizing the total revenue, decision-makers in lots of industries would like to guarantee balanced consumption across different resources. For instance, in the retailing industry, ensuring a balanced consumption of resources from different suppliers enhances fairness and helps main a healthy channel relationship; in the cloud computing industry, resource-consumption balance helps increase customer satisfaction and reduce operational costs. Motivated by these practical needs, this paper studies the price-based network revenue management (NRM) problem with both demand learning and fair resource-consumption balancing. We introduce the regularized revenue, i.e., the total revenue with a balancing regularization, as our objective to incorporate fair resource-consumption balancing into the revenue maximization goal. We propose a primal-dual-type online policy with the Upper-Confidence-Bound (UCB) demand learning method to maximize the regularized revenue. We adopt several innovative techniques to make our algorithm a unified and computationally efficient framework for the continuous price set and a wide class of balancing regularizers. Our algorithm achieves a worst-case regret of widetilde O(N5/2√T), where N denotes the number of products and T denotes the number of time periods. Numerical experiments in a few NRM examples demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm in simultaneously achieving revenue maximization and fair resource-consumption balancing

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2022.

Builds on

25 of 88 references.

References · 25

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  5. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 168
  6. 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 164
  7. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  8. 2015Linear Contextual Bandits with Knapsackscited by 82
  9. 2019Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combinationcited by 79
  10. 2020The Best of Many Worlds: Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 58
  11. 2017Calibrated Fairness in Banditscited by 43
  12. 2018The Many Faces of Exponential Weights in Online Learningcited by 33
13 more
  1. 2018Individual Fairness in Hindsightcited by 33
  2. 2018Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problemscited by 29
  3. 2020Regularized Online Allocation Problems: Fairness and Beyondcited by 22
  4. 2021Fair Exploration via Axiomatic Bargainingcited by 22
  5. 2021Group-Aware Threshold Adaptation for Fair Classificationcited by 21
  6. 2020Fairness, Welfare, and Equity in Personalized Pricingcited by 17
  7. 2019Fairness and Utilization in Allocating Resources with Uncertain Demandcited by 16
  8. 2019Fair Allocation through Selective Information Acquisitioncited by 16
  9. 2020Group-level Fairness Maximization in Online Bipartite Matchingcited by 14
  10. 2019Online Pricing with Offline Data: Phase Transition and Inverse Square Lawcited by 13
  11. 2021Fairness-aware Online Price Discrimination with Nonparametric Demand Modelscited by 7
  12. 2020Online Learning Demands in Max-min Fairnesscited by 6
  13. 2021Fairer LP-based Online Allocation via Analytic Centercited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.