mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fairness-aware Online Price Discrimination with Nonparametric Demand Models

arXiv 2111.08221 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Price discrimination, which refers to the strategy of setting different prices for different customer groups, has been widely used in online retailing. Although it helps boost the collected revenue for online retailers, it might create serious concerns about fairness, which even violates the regulation and laws. This paper studies the problem of dynamic discriminatory pricing under fairness constraints. In particular, we consider a finite selling horizon of length T for a single product with two groups of customers. Each group of customers has its unknown demand function that needs to be learned. For each selling period, the seller determines the price for each group and observes their purchase behavior. While existing literature mainly focuses on maximizing revenue, ensuring fairness among different customers has not been fully explored in the dynamic pricing literature. This work adopts the fairness notion from Cohen et al. (2022). For price fairness, we propose an optimal dynamic pricing policy regarding regret, which enforces the strict price fairness constraint. In contrast to the standard √T-type regret in online learning, we show that the optimal regret in our case is tildeO(T4/5). We further extend our algorithm to a more general notion of fairness, which includes demand fairness as a special case. To handle this general class, we propose a soft fairness constraint and develop a dynamic pricing policy that achieves tildeO(T4/5) regret. We also demonstrate that our algorithmic techniques can be adapted to more general scenarios such as fairness among multiple groups of customers.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2021.

Builds on

21 of 66 references.

References · 21

  1. 2013Non-stationary Stochastic Optimizationcited by 175
  2. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 168
  3. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  4. 2016Fairness in Reinforcement Learningcited by 95
  5. 2019Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combinationcited by 79
  6. 2016Dynamic Pricing in High-dimensionscited by 55
  7. 2017Calibrated Fairness in Banditscited by 43
  8. 2019Meta Dynamic Pricing: Transfer Learning Across Experimentscited by 42
  9. 2018Individual Fairness in Hindsightcited by 33
  10. 2016Multidimensional Binary Search for Contextual Decision-Makingcited by 27
  11. 2020Privacy-Preserving Dynamic Personalized Pricing with Demand Learningcited by 23
  12. 2020Regularized Online Allocation Problems: Fairness and Beyondcited by 22
9 more
  1. 2021Fair Exploration via Axiomatic Bargainingcited by 22
  2. 2021Group-Aware Threshold Adaptation for Fair Classificationcited by 21
  3. 2021Fair Dynamic Rationingcited by 19
  4. 2020Fairness, Welfare, and Equity in Personalized Pricingcited by 17
  5. 2019Fair Allocation through Selective Information Acquisitioncited by 16
  6. 2019Context-Based Dynamic Pricing with Online Clusteringcited by 14
  7. 2020Group-level Fairness Maximization in Online Bipartite Matchingcited by 14
  8. 2020Uncertainty Quantification for Demand Prediction in Contextual Dynamic Pricingcited by 7
  9. 2020Online Learning Demands in Max-min Fairnesscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.