mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Is Vertical Logistic Regression Privacy-Preserving? A Comprehensive Privacy Analysis and Beyond

arXiv 2207.09087 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2022cs.CR cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider vertical logistic regression (VLR) trained with mini-batch gradient descent -- a setting which has attracted growing interest among industries and proven to be useful in a wide range of applications including finance and medical research. We provide a comprehensive and rigorous privacy analysis of VLR in a class of open-source Federated Learning frameworks, where the protocols might differ between one another, yet a procedure of obtaining local gradients is implicitly shared. We first consider the honest-but-curious threat model, in which the detailed implementation of protocol is neglected and only the shared procedure is assumed, which we abstract as an oracle. We find that even under this general setting, single-dimension feature and label can still be recovered from the other party under suitable constraints of batch size, thus demonstrating the potential vulnerability of all frameworks following the same philosophy. Then we look into a popular instantiation of the protocol based on Homomorphic Encryption (HE). We propose an active attack that significantly weaken the constraints on batch size in the previous analysis via generating and compressing auxiliary ciphertext. To address the privacy leakage within the HE-based protocol, we develop a simple-yet-effective countermeasure based on Differential Privacy (DP), and provide both utility and privacy guarantees for the updated algorithm. Finally, we empirically verify the effectiveness of our attack and defense on benchmark datasets. Altogether, our findings suggest that all vertical federated learning frameworks that solely depend on HE might contain severe privacy risks, and DP, which has already demonstrated its power in horizontal federated learning, can also play a crucial role in the vertical setting, especially when coupled with HE or secure multi-party computation (MPC) techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2022.

Builds on

41 of 80 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  4. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  5. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  6. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  7. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  8. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
  9. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  10. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
  11. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
  12. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
29 more
  1. 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 572
  2. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 564
  3. 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
  4. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
  5. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
  6. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
  7. 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
  8. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 334
  9. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
  10. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
  11. 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 246
  12. 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
  13. 2017Private federated learning on vertically partitioned data via entity resolution and additively homomorphic encryptioncited by 176
  14. 2019SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 176
  15. 2017A Survey on Homomorphic Encryption Schemes: Theory and Implementationcited by 156
  16. 2014Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization: Efficient Algorithms and Tight Error Boundscited by 107
  17. 2020Feature Inference Attack on Model Predictions in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 106
  18. 2018A generic framework for privacy preserving deep learningcited by 103
  19. 2021Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split Learningcited by 90
  20. 2021UnSplit: Data-Oblivious Model Inversion, Model Stealing, and Label Inference Attacks Against Split Learningcited by 52
  21. 2020Multi-Participant Multi-Class Vertical Federated Learningcited by 47
  22. 2020Federated Doubly Stochastic Kernel Learning for Vertically Partitioned Datacited by 36
  23. 2019Interpret Federated Learning with Shapley Valuescited by 33
  24. 2020When Homomorphic Encryption Marries Secret Sharing: Secure Large-Scale Sparse Logistic Regression and Applications in Risk Controlcited by 32
  25. 2020Backdoor attacks and defenses in feature-partitioned collaborative learningcited by 30
  26. 2020A Vertical Federated Learning Method for Interpretable Scorecard and Its Application in Credit Scoringcited by 16
  27. 2019Quantification of the Leakage in Federated Learningcited by 7
  28. 2021Privacy Threats Analysis to Secure Federated Learningcited by 3
  29. 2018Zero Initialization of modified Gated Recurrent Encoder-Decoder Network for Short Term Load Forecastingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

7 papers.