mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MAD for Robust Reinforcement Learning in Machine Translation

arXiv 2207.08583 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2022cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a new distributed policy gradient algorithm and show that it outperforms existing reward-aware training procedures such as REINFORCE, minimum risk training (MRT) and proximal policy optimization (PPO) in terms of training stability and generalization performance when optimizing machine translation models. Our algorithm, which we call MAD (on account of using the mean absolute deviation in the importance weighting calculation), has distributed data generators sampling multiple candidates per source sentence on worker nodes, while a central learner updates the policy. MAD depends crucially on two variance reduction strategies: (1) a conditional reward normalization method that ensures each source sentence has both positive and negative reward translation examples and (2) a new robust importance weighting scheme that acts as a conditional entropy regularizer. Experiments on a variety of translation tasks show that policies learned using the MAD algorithm perform very well when using both greedy decoding and beam search, and that the learned policies are sensitive to the specific reward used during training.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2022.

Builds on

25 of 41 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  4. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  5. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  6. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
  7. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  8. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  9. 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 632
  10. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
  11. 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 364
  12. 2016An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Predictioncited by 158
13 more
  1. 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 114
  2. 2020If beam search is the answer, what was the question?cited by 114
  3. 2013The Optimal Reward Baseline for Gradient-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 84
  4. 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
  5. 2018A Study of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 74
  6. 2017Reinforcement Learning for Bandit Neural Machine Translation with Simulated Human Feedbackcited by 71
  7. 2020Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrationscited by 64
  8. 2017Classical Structured Prediction Losses for Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 55
  9. 2021Revisiting the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 32
  10. 2017Bandit Structured Prediction for Neural Sequence-to-Sequence Learningcited by 31
  11. 2021Reverb: A Framework For Experience Replaycited by 27
  12. 2021Launchpad: A Programming Model for Distributed Machine Learning Researchcited by 14
  13. 2020Softmax Tempering for Training Neural Machine Translation Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

7 papers.