mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MAPPING: Debiasing Graph Neural Networks for Fair Node Classification with Limited Sensitive Information Leakage

arXiv 2401.12824 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite remarkable success in diverse web-based applications, Graph Neural Networks(GNNs) inherit and further exacerbate historical discrimination and social stereotypes, which critically hinder their deployments in high-stake domains such as online clinical diagnosis, financial crediting, etc. However, current fairness research that primarily craft on i.i.d data, cannot be trivially replicated to non-i.i.d. graph structures with topological dependence among samples. Existing fair graph learning typically favors pairwise constraints to achieve fairness but fails to cast off dimensional limitations and generalize them into multiple sensitive attributes; besides, most studies focus on in-processing techniques to enforce and calibrate fairness, constructing a model-agnostic debiasing GNN framework at the pre-processing stage to prevent downstream misuses and improve training reliability is still largely under-explored. Furthermore, previous work on GNNs tend to enhance either fairness or privacy individually but few probe into their interplays. In this paper, we propose a novel model-agnostic debiasing framework named MAPPING (underlineMasking underlineAnd underlinePruning and Message-underlinePassing trainunderlineING) for fair node classification, in which we adopt the distance covariance(dCov)-based fairness constraints to simultaneously reduce feature and topology biases in arbitrary dimensions, and combine them with adversarial debiasing to confine the risks of attribute inference attacks. Experiments on real-world datasets with different GNN variants demonstrate the effectiveness and flexibility of MAPPING. Our results show that MAPPING can achieve better trade-offs between utility and fairness, and mitigate privacy risks of sensitive information leakage.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2024.

Builds on

47 of 71 references.

References · 47

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  5. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  6. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
  7. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  8. 2019Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendationcited by 711
  9. 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
  10. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  11. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  12. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
35 more
  1. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
  2. 2020Say No to the Discrimination: Learning Fair Graph Neural Networks with Limited Sensitive Attribute Informationcited by 168
  3. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  4. 2019Understanding the Limitations of Variational Mutual Information Estimatorscited by 140
  5. 2021Towards a Unified Framework for Fair and Stable Graph Representation Learningcited by 128
  6. 2019Compositional Fairness Constraints for Graph Embeddingscited by 126
  7. 2020Stealing Links from Graph Neural Networkscited by 114
  8. 2021EDITS: Modeling and Mitigating Data Bias for Graph Neural Networkscited by 92
  9. 2020Quantifying Privacy Leakage in Graph Embeddingcited by 82
  10. 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
  11. 2021Node-Level Membership Inference Attacks Against Graph Neural Networkscited by 80
  12. 2022Fairness in Graph Mining: A Surveycited by 76
  13. 2021FairDrop: Biased Edge Dropout for Enhancing Fairness in Graph Representation Learningcited by 68
  14. 2020Locally Private Graph Neural Networkscited by 64
  15. 2022Improving Fairness in Graph Neural Networks via Mitigating Sensitive Attribute Leakagecited by 61
  16. 2019Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Datacited by 58
  17. 2020FR-Train: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 52
  18. 2019Repairing without Retraining: Avoiding Disparate Impact with Counterfactual Distributionscited by 48
  19. 2022Are Attribute Inference Attacks Just Imputation?cited by 48
  20. 2021Towards Fair Classifiers Without Sensitive Attributes: Exploring Biases in Related Featurescited by 45
  21. 2021Graph Embedding for Recommendation against Attribute Inference Attackscited by 40
  22. 2022FMP: Toward Fair Graph Message Passing against Topology Biascited by 35
  23. 2021Fair Representation Learning for Heterogeneous Information Networkscited by 28
  24. 2020When OT meets MoM: Robust estimation of Wasserstein Distancecited by 23
  25. 2021Privacy-Preserving Representation Learning on Graphs: A Mutual Information Perspectivecited by 23
  26. 2020Adversarial Privacy Preserving Graph Embedding against Inference Attackcited by 21
  27. 2020Differentially Private and Fair Classification via Calibrated Functional Mechanismcited by 20
  28. 2022Label-Only Membership Inference Attack against Node-Level Graph Neural Networkscited by 18
  29. 2023Unraveling Privacy Risks of Individual Fairness in Graph Neural Networkscited by 16
  30. 2021Private Graph Data Release: A Surveycited by 15
  31. 2014Fast Computing for Distance Covariancecited by 13
  32. 2023An Empirical Analysis of Fairness Notions under Differential Privacycited by 9
  33. 2022Learning Fair Models without Sensitive Attributes: A Generative Approachcited by 6
  34. 2022When Fairness Meets Privacy: Fair Classification with Semi-Private Sensitive Attributescited by 6
  35. 2017A Statistically and Numerically Efficient Independence Test based on Random Projections and Distance Covariancecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.