Z-Index at CheckThat! Lab 2022: Check-Worthiness Identification on Tweet Text
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The wide use of social media and digital technologies facilitates sharing various news and information about events and activities. Despite sharing positive information misleading and false information is also spreading on social media. There have been efforts in identifying such misleading information both manually by human experts and automatic tools. Manual effort does not scale well due to the high volume of information, containing factual claims, are appearing online. Therefore, automatically identifying check-worthy claims can be very useful for human experts. In this study, we describe our participation in Subtask-1A: Check-worthiness of tweets (English, Dutch and Spanish) of CheckThat! lab at CLEF 2022. We performed standard preprocessing steps and applied different models to identify whether a given text is worthy of fact checking or not. We use the oversampling technique to balance the dataset and applied SVM and Random Forest (RF) with TF-IDF representations. We also used BERT multilingual (BERT-m) and XLM-RoBERTa-base pre-trained models for the experiments. We used BERT-m for the official submissions and our systems ranked as 3rd, 5th, and 12th in Spanish, Dutch, and English, respectively. In further experiments, our evaluation shows that transformer models (BERT-m and XLM-RoBERTa-base) outperform the SVM and RF in Dutch and English languages where a different scenario is observed for Spanish.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2022.
Builds on
19 of 52 references.
References · 19
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2021Automated Fact-Checking for Assisting Human Fact-Checkerscited by 144
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articlescited by 130
- 2020Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic: Modeling the Perspective of Journalists, Fact-Checkers, Social Media Platforms, Policy Makers, and the Societycited by 72
- 2020A Survey on Computational Propaganda Detectioncited by 69
- 2021SemEval-2021 Task 6: Detection of Persuasion Techniques in Texts and Imagescited by 49
- 2021A Survey on Multimodal Disinformation Detectioncited by 47
- 2021Detecting Propaganda Techniques in Memescited by 43
- 2018Overview of the CLEF-2018 CheckThat! Lab on Automatic Identification and Verification of Political Claims. Task 1: Check-Worthinesscited by 41
- 2020Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic in Social Media: A Holistic Perspective and a Call to Armscited by 41
- 2018ClaimRank: Detecting Check-Worthy Claims in Arabic and Englishcited by 27
7 more
- 2021Overview of the CLEF--2021 CheckThat! Lab on Detecting Check-Worthy Claims, Previously Fact-Checked Claims, and Fake Newscited by 23
- 2021Assisting the Human Fact-Checkers: Detecting All Previously Fact-Checked Claims in a Documentcited by 19
- 2021Overview of the CLEF-2019 CheckThat!: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claimscited by 18
- 2020A Multimodal Memes Classification: A Survey and Open Research Issuescited by 14
- 2021Findings of the NLP4IF-2021 Shared Tasks on Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic and Censorship Detectioncited by 14
- 2021A Review of Bangla Natural Language Processing Tasks and the Utility of Transformer Modelscited by 13
- 2021Misinformation, Believability, and Vaccine Acceptance Over 40 Countries: Takeaways From the Initial Phase of The COVID-19 Infodemiccited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.