mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Weaknesses of Adversarial Camouflage in Overhead Imagery

arXiv 2207.02963 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2022cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning is increasingly critical for analysis of the ever-growing corpora of overhead imagery. Advanced computer vision object detection techniques have demonstrated great success in identifying objects of interest such as ships, automobiles, and aircraft from satellite and drone imagery. Yet relying on computer vision opens up significant vulnerabilities, namely, the susceptibility of object detection algorithms to adversarial attacks. In this paper we explore the efficacy and drawbacks of adversarial camouflage in an overhead imagery context. While a number of recent papers have demonstrated the ability to reliably fool deep learning classifiers and object detectors with adversarial patches, most of this work has been performed on relatively uniform datasets and only a single class of objects. In this work we utilize the VisDrone dataset, which has a large range of perspectives and object sizes. We explore four different object classes: bus, car, truck, van. We build a library of 24 adversarial patches to disguise these objects, and introduce a patch translucency variable to our patches. The translucency (or alpha value) of the patches is highly correlated to their efficacy. Further, we show that while adversarial patches may fool object detectors, the presence of such patches is often easily uncovered, with patches on average 24% more detectable than the objects the patches were meant to hide. This raises the question of whether such patches truly constitute camouflage. Source code is available at https://github.com/IQTLabs/camolo.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2022.

Builds on

13 of 16 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  2. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
  3. 2017DOTA: A Large-scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Imagescited by 623
  4. 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detectioncited by 275
  5. 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
  6. 2020Detection and Tracking Meet Drones Challengecited by 263
  7. 2021Dual Attention Suppression Attack: Generate Adversarial Camouflage in Physical Worldcited by 127
  8. 2020Adversarial Camouflage: Hiding Physical-World Attacks with Natural Stylescited by 126
  9. 2017Universal Adversarial Perturbations Against Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 92
  10. 2021Adversarial Laser Beam: Effective Physical-World Attack to DNNs in a Blinkcited by 75
  11. 2017NO Need to Worry about Adversarial Examples in Object Detection in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 48
  12. 2020RarePlanes: Synthetic Data Takes Flightcited by 48
1 more
  1. 2020Adversarial Patch Camouflage against Aerial Detectioncited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.