mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pre-processing and Compression: Understanding Hidden Representation Refinement Across Imaging Domains via Intrinsic Dimension

arXiv 2408.08381 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2024cs.CV cs.LG eess.IVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, there has been interest in how geometric properties such as intrinsic dimension (ID) of a neural network's hidden representations change through its layers, and how such properties are predictive of important model behavior such as generalization ability. However, evidence has begun to emerge that such behavior can change significantly depending on the domain of the network's training data, such as natural versus medical images. Here, we further this inquiry by exploring how the ID of a network's learned representations changes through its layers, in essence, characterizing how the network successively refines the information content of input data to be used for predictions. Analyzing eleven natural and medical image datasets across six network architectures, we find that how ID changes through the network differs noticeably between natural and medical image models. Specifically, medical image models peak in representation ID earlier in the network, implying a difference in the image features and their abstractness that are typically used for downstream tasks in these domains. Additionally, we discover a strong correlation of this peak representation ID with the ID of the data in its input space, implying that the intrinsic information content of a model's learned representations is guided by that of the data it was trained on. Overall, our findings emphasize notable discrepancies in network behavior between natural and non-natural imaging domains regarding hidden representation information content, and provide further insights into how a network's learned features are shaped by its training data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2024.

Builds on

15 of 34 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
  4. 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 307
  5. 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
  6. 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 276
  7. 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 246
  8. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  9. 2023The geometry of hidden representations of large transformer modelscited by 108
  10. 2018On the Intrinsic Dimensionality of Image Representationscited by 57
  11. 2017Automatic Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis from Plain Radiographs: A Deep Learning-Based Approachcited by 42
  12. 2019Geometry-Aware Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 15
3 more
  1. 2024The Effect of Intrinsic Dataset Properties on Generalization: Unraveling Learning Differences Between Natural and Medical Imagescited by 13
  2. 2022The Intrinsic Manifolds of Radiological Images and their Role in Deep Learningcited by 10
  3. 2023Exploring the Representation Manifolds of Stable Diffusion Through the Lens of Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.