mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Weakly Supervised Grounding for VQA in Vision-Language Transformers

arXiv 2207.02334 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2022cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transformers for visual-language representation learning have been getting a lot of interest and shown tremendous performance on visual question answering (VQA) and grounding. But most systems that show good performance of those tasks still rely on pre-trained object detectors during training, which limits their applicability to the object classes available for those detectors. To mitigate this limitation, the following paper focuses on the problem of weakly supervised grounding in context of visual question answering in transformers. The approach leverages capsules by grouping each visual token in the visual encoder and uses activations from language self-attention layers as a text-guided selection module to mask those capsules before they are forwarded to the next layer. We evaluate our approach on the challenging GQA as well as VQA-HAT dataset for VQA grounding. Our experiments show that: while removing the information of masked objects from standard transformer architectures leads to a significant drop in performance, the integration of capsules significantly improves the grounding ability of such systems and provides new state-of-the-art results compared to other approaches in the field.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2022.

Builds on

56 of 70 references.

References · 56

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  5. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  6. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  7. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  8. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  9. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
  10. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  11. 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,291
  12. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
38 more
  1. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
  2. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,009
  3. 2019VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representationscited by 954
  4. 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 852
  5. 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
  6. 2019Unicoder-VL: A Universal Encoder for Vision and Language by Cross-modal Pre-trainingcited by 451
  7. 2020VirTex: Learning Visual Representations from Textual Annotationscited by 338
  8. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  9. 2015Visual7W: Grounded Question Answering in Imagescited by 315
  10. 2020Pixel-BERT: Aligning Image Pixels with Text by Deep Multi-Modal Transformerscited by 288
  11. 2016Hierarchical Question-Image Co-Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 278
  12. 201912-in-1: Multi-Task Vision and Language Representation Learningcited by 278
  13. 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
  14. 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
  15. 2019UNITER: UNiversal Image-TExt Representation Learningcited by 225
  16. 2021Seeing Out of tHe bOx: End-to-End Pre-training for Vision-Language Representation Learningcited by 187
  17. 2018Compositional Attention Networks for Machine Reasoningcited by 183
  18. 2019Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Groundedcited by 127
  19. 2021How to represent part-whole hierarchies in a neural networkcited by 123
  20. 2016Human Attention in Visual Question Answering: Do Humans and Deep Networks Look at the Same Regions?cited by 111
  21. 2018Overcoming Language Priors in Visual Question Answering with Adversarial Regularizationcited by 104
  22. 2021Thinking Fast and Slow: Efficient Text-to-Visual Retrieval with Transformerscited by 93
  23. 2021xGQA: Cross-Lingual Visual Question Answeringcited by 72
  24. 2019Weakly-Supervised Spatio-Temporally Grounding Natural Sentence in Videocited by 60
  25. 2019Align2Ground: Weakly Supervised Phrase Grounding Guided by Image-Caption Alignmentcited by 51
  26. 2020Improving Weakly Supervised Visual Grounding by Contrastive Knowledge Distillationcited by 51
  27. 2021Efficient-CapsNet: Capsule Network with Self-Attention Routingcited by 41
  28. 2017Weakly-supervised Visual Grounding of Phrases with Linguistic Structurescited by 40
  29. 2017Exploring Human-like Attention Supervision in Visual Question Answeringcited by 36
  30. 2021Relation-aware Instance Refinement for Weakly Supervised Visual Groundingcited by 35
  31. 2018Knowledge Aided Consistency for Weakly Supervised Phrase Groundingcited by 32
  32. 2018Capsules for Object Segmentationcited by 30
  33. 2018VideoCapsuleNet: A Simplified Network for Action Detectioncited by 30
  34. 2019CapsuleVOS: Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation Using Capsule Routingcited by 29
  35. 2018Interpretable Visual Question Answering by Visual Grounding from Attention Supervision Miningcited by 28
  36. 2021Separating Skills and Concepts for Novel Visual Question Answeringcited by 24
  37. 2021Found a Reason for me? Weakly-supervised Grounded Visual Question Answering using Capsulescited by 22
  38. 2021Centroid Transformers: Learning to Abstract with Attentioncited by 20

50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

8 papers.