mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dynamic Ranking and Translation Synchronization

arXiv 2207.01455 ↗First posted 4 Jul 2022math.ST stat.ML stat.THcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many applications, such as sport tournaments or recommendation systems, we have at our disposal data consisting of pairwise comparisons between a set of n items (or players). The objective is to use this data to infer the latent strength of each item and/or their ranking. Existing results for this problem predominantly focus on the setting consisting of a single comparison graph G. However, there exist scenarios (e.g., sports tournaments) where the the pairwise comparison data evolves with time. Theoretical results for this dynamic setting are relatively limited and is the focus of this paper. We study an extension of the translation synchronization problem, to the dynamic setting. In this setup, we are given a sequence of comparison graphs (Gt)t∈ T, where T subset [0,1] is a grid representing the time domain, and for each item i and time t∈ T there is an associated unknown strength parameter z^*t,i∈ ℝ. We aim to recover, for t∈T, the strength vector z^*t=(z^*t,1,dots,z^*t,n) from noisy measurements of z^*t,i-z^*t,j, where i,j is an edge in Gt. Assuming that z^*t evolves smoothly in t, we propose two estimators -- one based on a smoothness-penalized least squares approach and the other based on projection onto the low frequency eigenspace of a suitable smoothness operator. For both estimators, we provide finite sample bounds for the ℓ2 estimation error under the assumption that Gt is connected for all t∈ T, thus proving the consistency of the proposed methods in terms of the grid size |T|. We complement our theoretical findings with experiments on synthetic and real data.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2022.

Builds on

13 of 58 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Simple, Robust and Optimal Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 68
  2. 2017Spectral Method and Regularized MLE Are Both Optimal for Top-K Rankingcited by 46
  3. 2015Stochastically Transitive Models for Pairwise Comparisons: Statistical and Computational Issuescited by 32
  4. 2014Tightness of the maximum likelihood semidefinite relaxation for angular synchronizationcited by 23
  5. 2016Total Variation Classes Beyond 1d: Minimax Rates, and the Limitations of Linear Smootherscited by 20
  6. 2017Minimax Rates and Efficient Algorithms for Noisy Sortingcited by 15
  7. 2015Sync-Rank: Robust Ranking, Constrained Ranking and Rank Aggregation via Eigenvector and Semidefinite Programming Synchronizationcited by 14
  8. 2020Solving Orthogonal Group Synchronization via Convex and Low-Rank Optimization: Tightness and Landscape Analysiscited by 10
  9. 2019Ranking and synchronization from pairwise measurements via SVDcited by 9
  10. 2017Solving SDPs for synchronization and MaxCut problems via the Grothendieck inequalitycited by 8
  11. 2020Nonparametric Estimation in the Dynamic Bradley-Terry Modelcited by 8
  12. 2021Dynamic Ranking with the BTL Model: A Nearest Neighbor based Rank Centrality Methodcited by 5
1 more
  1. 2019Graph Resistance and Learning from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.