Dynamic Ranking with the BTL Model: A Nearest Neighbor based Rank Centrality Method
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many applications such as recommendation systems or sports tournaments involve pairwise comparisons within a collection of n items, the goal being to aggregate the binary outcomes of the comparisons in order to recover the latent strength and/or global ranking of the items. In recent years, this problem has received significant interest from a theoretical perspective with a number of methods being proposed, along with associated statistical guarantees under the assumption of a suitable generative model. While these results typically collect the pairwise comparisons as one comparison graph G, however in many applications - such as the outcomes of soccer matches during a tournament - the nature of pairwise outcomes can evolve with time. Theoretical results for such a dynamic setting are relatively limited compared to the aforementioned static setting. We study in this paper an extension of the classic BTL (Bradley-Terry-Luce) model for the static setting to our dynamic setup under the assumption that the probabilities of the pairwise outcomes evolve smoothly over the time domain [0,1]. Given a sequence of comparison graphs (Gt')t' ∈ T on a regular grid T subset [0,1], we aim at recovering the latent strengths of the items wt^* ∈ ℝn at any time t ∈ [0,1]. To this end, we adapt the Rank Centrality method - a popular spectral approach for ranking in the static case - by locally averaging the available data on a suitable neighborhood of t. When (Gt')t' ∈ T is a sequence of Erd"os-Renyi graphs, we provide non-asymptotic ℓ2 and ℓ∞ error bounds for estimating wt^* which in particular establishes the consistency of this method in terms of n, and the grid size lvertTrvert. We also complement our theoretical analysis with experiments on real and synthetic data.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2021.
Builds on
6 of 33 references.
References · 6
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
- 2015Simple, Robust and Optimal Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 70
- 2017Spectral Method and Regularized MLE Are Both Optimal for Top-K Rankingcited by 47
- 2015Stochastically Transitive Models for Pairwise Comparisons: Statistical and Computational Issuescited by 32
- 2019Ranking and synchronization from pairwise measurements via SVDcited by 9
- 2020Nonparametric Estimation in the Dynamic Bradley-Terry Modelcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Dynamic Ranking and Translation Synchronizationcited by 4
- 2024Rate-Optimal Rank Aggregation with Private Pairwise Rankingscited by 1
- 2024Dynamic angular synchronization under smoothness constraintscited by 0
- 2025Preference-Based Dynamic Ranking Structure Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026Distribution-informed Efficient Conformal Prediction for Full Rankingcited by 0
- 2026Distribution-informed Efficient Conformal Prediction for Full Ranking30 Jan 2026
- 2025Preference-Based Dynamic Ranking Structure Recognition29 Sep 2025
- 2024Dynamic angular synchronization under smoothness constraints6 Jun 2024
- 2024Rate-Optimal Rank Aggregation with Private Pairwise Rankings26 Feb 2024
- 2022Dynamic Ranking and Translation Synchronization4 Jul 2022