Graph Resistance and Learning from Pairwise Comparisons
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of learning the qualities of a collection of items by performing noisy comparisons among them. Following the standard paradigm, we assume there is a fixed "comparison graph" and every neighboring pair of items in this graph is compared k times according to the Bradley-Terry-Luce model (where the probability than an item wins a comparison is proportional the item quality). We are interested in how the relative error in quality estimation scales with the comparison graph in the regime where k is large. We prove that, after a known transition period, the relevant graph-theoretic quantity is the square root of the resistance of the comparison graph. Specifically, we provide an algorithm that is minimax optimal. The algorithm has a relative error decay that scales with the square root of the graph resistance, and provide a matching lower bound (up to log factors). The performance guarantee of our algorithm, both in terms of the graph and the skewness of the item quality distribution, outperforms earlier results.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
4 papers.
- 2021ℓ∞-Bounds of the MLE in the BTL Model under General Comparison Graphscited by 8
- 2022Dynamic Ranking and Translation Synchronizationcited by 4
- 2023Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons in General Graphs and Graphs with Localitycited by 3
- 2023Ranking a Set of Objects using Heterogeneous Workers: QUITE an Easy Problemcited by 0
- 2023Ranking a Set of Objects using Heterogeneous Workers: QUITE an Easy Problem3 Oct 2023
- 2023Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons in General Graphs and Graphs with Locality13 Apr 2023
- 2022Dynamic Ranking and Translation Synchronization4 Jul 2022
- 2021ℓ∞-Bounds of the MLE in the BTL Model under General Comparison Graphs20 Oct 2021