mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tightness of the maximum likelihood semidefinite relaxation for angular synchronization

arXiv 1411.3272 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2014math.OCcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Maximum likelihood estimation problems are, in general, intractable optimization problems. As a result, it is common to approximate the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) using convex relaxations. In some cases, the relaxation is tight: it recovers the true MLE. Most tightness proofs only apply to situations where the MLE exactly recovers a planted solution (known to the analyst). It is then sufficient to establish that the optimality conditions hold at the planted signal. In this paper, we study an estimation problem (angular synchronization) for which the MLE is not a simple function of the planted solution, yet for which the convex relaxation is tight. To establish tightness in this context, the proof is less direct because the point at which to verify optimality conditions is not known explicitly. Angular synchronization consists in estimating a collection of n phases, given noisy measurements of the pairwise relative phases. The MLE for angular synchronization is the solution of a (hard) non-bipartite Grothendieck problem over the complex numbers. We consider a stochastic model for the data: a planted signal (that is, a ground truth set of phases) is corrupted with non-adversarial random noise. Even though the MLE does not coincide with the planted signal, we show that the classical semidefinite relaxation for it is tight, with high probability. This holds even for high levels of noise.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 8; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Advances in Inference and Representation for Simultaneous Localization and Mappingcited by 16
  2. 2026Advances in Global Solvers for 3D Visioncited by 12
  3. 2021Optimal Orthogonal Group Synchronization and Rotation Group Synchronizationcited by 4
  4. 2022Dynamic Ranking and Translation Synchronizationcited by 4
  5. 2024Efficient Detection of Long Consistent Cycles and its Application to Distributed Synchronizationcited by 4
  6. 2021SDP Achieves Exact Minimax Optimality in Phase Synchronizationcited by 3
  7. 2022Low-Rank Extragradient Method for Nonsmooth and Low-Rank Matrix Optimization Problemscited by 3
  8. 2023ReSync: Riemannian Subgradient-based Robust Rotation Synchronizationcited by 3
  9. 2021Spectral Robustness for Correlation Clustering Reconstruction in Semi-Adversarial Modelscited by 2
  10. 2022Towards Understanding The Semidefinite Relaxations of Truncated Least-Squares in Robust Rotation Searchcited by 2
  11. 2023Robust Angular Synchronization via Directed Graph Neural Networkscited by 2
  12. 2026NS-RGS: Newton-Schulz based Riemannian gradient method for orthogonal group synchronizationcited by 2
11 more
  1. 2021Generalized Orthogonal Procrustes Problem under Arbitrary Adversariescited by 1
  2. 2022Unrolled algorithms for group synchronizationcited by 1
  3. 2022Synthetic Principal Component Design: Fast Covariate Balancing with Synthetic Controlscited by 1
  4. 2024Rotation Averaging: A Primal-Dual Method and Closed-Forms in Cycle Graphscited by 1
  5. 2022Low-Rank Mirror-Prox for Nonsmooth and Low-Rank Matrix Optimization Problemscited by 0
  6. 2022Multi-Frequency Joint Community Detection and Phase Synchronizationcited by 0
  7. 2022Parabolic Relaxation for Quadratically-constrained Quadratic Programming -- Part I: Definitions & Basic Propertiescited by 0
  8. 2024Convex Relaxation for Solving Large-Margin Classifiers in Hyperbolic Spacecited by 0
  9. 2024Dynamic angular synchronization under smoothness constraintscited by 0
  10. 2024Entry-Specific Matrix Estimation under Arbitrary Sampling Patterns through the Lens of Network Flowscited by 0
  11. 2026JigSync: Gauge-Resolved Synchronization for Jigsaw Reassembly under Unknown Piece Orientationcited by 0