Scalable Optimization for Wind Farm Control using Coordination Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Wind farms are a crucial driver toward the generation of ecological and renewable energy. Due to their rapid increase in capacity, contemporary wind farms need to adhere to strict constraints on power output to ensure stability of the electricity grid. Specifically, a wind farm controller is required to match the farm's power production with a power demand imposed by the grid operator. This is a non-trivial optimization problem, as complex dependencies exist between the wind turbines. State-of-the-art wind farm control typically relies on physics-based heuristics that fail to capture the full load spectrum that defines a turbine's health status. When this is not taken into account, the long-term viability of the farm's turbines is put at risk. Given the complex dependencies that determine a turbine's lifetime, learning a flexible and optimal control strategy requires a data-driven approach. However, as wind farms are large-scale multi-agent systems, optimizing control strategies over the full joint action space is intractable. We propose a new learning method for wind farm control that leverages the sparse wind farm structure to factorize the optimization problem. Using a Bayesian approach, based on multi-agent Thompson sampling, we explore the factored joint action space for configurations that match the demand, while considering the lifetime of turbines. We apply our method to a grid-like wind farm layout, and evaluate configurations using a state-of-the-art wind flow simulator. Our results are competitive with a physics-based heuristic approach in terms of demand error, while, contrary to the heuristic, our method prolongs the lifetime of high-risk turbines.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2021.
Builds on
5 of 46 references.
References · 5
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 433
- 2017Bayesian Best-Arm Identification for Selecting Influenza Mitigation Strategiescited by 8
- 2019Fleet Control using Coregionalized Gaussian Process Policy Iterationcited by 5
- 2019Fleetwide data-enabled reliability improvement of wind turbinescited by 4
- 2019Multi-Agent Thompson Sampling for Bandit Applications with Sparse Neighbourhood Structurescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 256
- 2025WFCRL: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Wind Farm Controlcited by 7
- 2022Multi-Objective Coordination Graphs for the Expected Scalarised Returns with Generative Flow Modelscited by 3
- 2023Finite-Time Frequentist Regret Bounds of Multi-Agent Thompson Sampling on Sparse Hypergraphscited by 1
- 2024Preference-Conditioned Gradient Variations for Multi-Objective Quality-Diversitycited by 1
- 2025WFCRL: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Wind Farm Control23 Jan 2025
- 2024Preference-Conditioned Gradient Variations for Multi-Objective Quality-Diversity19 Nov 2024
- 2023Finite-Time Frequentist Regret Bounds of Multi-Agent Thompson Sampling on Sparse Hypergraphs24 Dec 2023
- 2022Multi-Objective Coordination Graphs for the Expected Scalarised Returns with Generative Flow Models1 Jul 2022
- 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planning17 Mar 2021