Accurate and Real-time Pseudo Lidar Detection: Is Stereo Neural Network Really Necessary?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The proposal of Pseudo-Lidar representation has significantly narrowed the gap between visual-based and active Lidar-based 3D object detection. However, current researches exclusively focus on pushing the accuracy improvement of Pseudo-Lidar by taking the advantage of complex and time-consuming neural networks. Seldom explore the profound characteristics of Pseudo-Lidar representation to obtain the promoting opportunities. In this paper, we dive deep into the pseudo Lidar representation and argue that the performance of 3D object detection is not fully dependent on the high precision stereo depth estimation. We demonstrate that even for the unreliable depth estimation, with proper data processing and refining, it can achieve comparable 3D object detection accuracy. With this finding, we further show the possibility that utilizing fast but inaccurate stereo matching algorithms in the Pseudo-Lidar system to achieve low latency responsiveness. In the experiments, we develop a system with a less powerful stereo matching predictor and adopt the proposed refinement schemes to improve the accuracy. The evaluation on the KITTI benchmark shows that the presented system achieves competitive accuracy to the state-of-the-art approaches with only 23 ms computing, showing it is a suitable candidate for deploying to real car-hold applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2022.
Builds on
28 of 35 references.
References · 28
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
- 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
- 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 941
- 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 881
- 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 724
- 2017Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Datacited by 640
- 2018Pyramid Stereo Matching Networkcited by 489
- 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 457
- 2017Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregationcited by 326
- 2021Voxel Transformer for 3D Object Detectioncited by 247
- 2020AANet: Adaptive Aggregation Network for Efficient Stereo Matchingcited by 202
16 more
- 2019Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 188
- 2020Hierarchical Neural Architecture Search for Deep Stereo Matchingcited by 166
- 2019Stereo R-CNN based 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 163
- 2015Stereo Matching by Training a Convolutional Neural Network to Compare Image Patchescited by 151
- 2021SE-SSD: Self-Ensembling Single-Stage Object Detector From Point Cloudcited by 119
- 2019Monocular 3D Object Detection with Pseudo-LiDAR Point Cloudcited by 113
- 2020Rethinking Pseudo-LiDAR Representationcited by 109
- 2021SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generationcited by 94
- 2020End-to-End Pseudo-LiDAR for Image-Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 80
- 2020Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimationcited by 43
- 2019Triangulation Learning Network: from Monocular to Stereo 3D Object Detectioncited by 40
- 2019Object-Centric Stereo Matching for 3D Object Detectioncited by 29
- 2020ZoomNet: Part-Aware Adaptive Zooming Neural Network for 3D Object Detectioncited by 25
- 2021A Decomposition Model for Stereo Matchingcited by 25
- 2020RTS3D: Real-time Stereo 3D Detection from 4D Feature-Consistency Embedding Space for Autonomous Drivingcited by 16
- 2016Embedded real-time stereo estimation via Semi-Global Matching on the GPUcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.