"You Can't Fix What You Can't Measure": Privately Measuring Demographic Performance Disparities in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As in traditional machine learning models, models trained with federated learning may exhibit disparate performance across demographic groups. Model holders must identify these disparities to mitigate undue harm to the groups. However, measuring a model's performance in a group requires access to information about group membership which, for privacy reasons, often has limited availability. We propose novel locally differentially private mechanisms to measure differences in performance across groups while protecting the privacy of group membership. To analyze the effectiveness of the mechanisms, we bound their error in estimating a disparity when optimized for a given privacy budget. Our results show that the error rapidly decreases for realistic numbers of participating clients, demonstrating that, contrary to what prior work suggested, protecting privacy is not necessarily in conflict with identifying performance disparities of federated models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2022.
Builds on
35 of 78 references.
References · 35
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 572
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 204
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 164
- 2018Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 152
23 more
- 2021FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 118
- 2017Finite Sample Differentially Private Confidence Intervalscited by 104
- 2018Differentially Private Fair Learningcited by 76
- 2019The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Modelcited by 74
- 2021Covariance-Aware Private Mean Estimation Without Private Covariance Estimationcited by 46
- 2019Differential Privacy-enabled Federated Learning for Sensitive Health Datacited by 44
- 2020Multilingual Twitter Corpus and Baselines for Evaluating Demographic Bias in Hate Speech Recognitioncited by 43
- 2018Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributescited by 41
- 2022Optimal Algorithms for Mean Estimation under Local Differential Privacycited by 36
- 2021Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Informationcited by 33
- 2020Improving on-device speaker verification using federated learning with privacycited by 30
- 2016Collecting and Analyzing Data from Smart Device Users with Local Differential Privacycited by 25
- 2019Federated Learning for Ranking Browser History Suggestionscited by 24
- 2019Awareness in Practice: Tensions in Access to Sensitive Attribute Data for Antidiscriminationcited by 23
- 2020A Federated Learning Framework for Healthcare IoT devicescited by 22
- 2022Bias in Automated Speaker Recognitioncited by 20
- 2022Adaptive Sampling Strategies to Construct Equitable Training Datasetscited by 18
- 2021Multiaccurate Proxies for Downstream Fairnesscited by 17
- 2018Locally Private Hypothesis Testingcited by 11
- 2021FedMood: Federated Learning on Mobile Health Data for Mood Detectioncited by 10
- 2021Federated Learning Meets Fairness and Differential Privacycited by 9
- 2019PCKV: Locally Differentially Private Correlated Key-Value Data Collection with Optimized Utilitycited by 6
- 2020Federated Learning of User Authentication Modelscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.