mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Locally Private Hypothesis Testing

arXiv 1802.03441 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2018cs.CRcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We initiate the study of differentially private hypothesis testing in the local-model, under both the standard (symmetric) randomized-response mechanism (Warner, 1965, Kasiviswanathan et al, 2008) and the newer (non-symmetric) mechanisms (Bassily and Smith, 2015, Bassily et al, 2017). First, we study the general framework of mapping each user's type into a signal and show that the problem of finding the maximum-likelihood distribution over the signals is feasible. Then we discuss the randomized-response mechanism and show that, in essence, it maps the null- and alternative-hypotheses onto new sets, an affine translation of the original sets. We then give sample complexity bounds for identity and independence testing under randomized-response. We then move to the newer non-symmetric mechanisms and show that there too the problem of finding the maximum-likelihood distribution is feasible. Under the mechanism of Bassily et al (2007) we give identity and independence testers with better sample complexity than the testers in the symmetric case, and we also propose a chi2-based identity tester which we investigate empirically.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

11 papers.