mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Federated Fairness without Access to Sensitive Groups

arXiv 2402.14929 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current approaches to group fairness in federated learning assume the existence of predefined and labeled sensitive groups during training. However, due to factors ranging from emerging regulations to dynamics and location-dependency of protected groups, this assumption may be unsuitable in many real-world scenarios. In this work, we propose a new approach to guarantee group fairness that does not rely on any predefined definition of sensitive groups or additional labels. Our objective allows the federation to learn a Pareto efficient global model ensuring worst-case group fairness and it enables, via a single hyper-parameter, trade-offs between fairness and utility, subject only to a group size constraint. This implies that any sufficiently large subset of the population is guaranteed to receive at least a minimum level of utility performance from the model. The proposed objective encompasses existing approaches as special cases, such as empirical risk minimization and subgroup robustness objectives from centralized machine learning. We provide an algorithm to solve this problem in federation that enjoys convergence and excess risk guarantees. Our empirical results indicate that the proposed approach can effectively improve the worst-performing group that may be present without unnecessarily hurting the average performance, exhibits superior or comparable performance to relevant baselines, and achieves a large set of solutions with different fairness-utility trade-offs.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.

Builds on

26 of 45 references.

References · 26

  1. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  3. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  5. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 558
  6. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  7. 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 451
  8. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
  9. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
  10. 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimizationcited by 312
  11. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  12. 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 208
14 more
  1. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
  2. 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
  3. 2021Distributionally Robust Federated Averagingcited by 104
  4. 2020Distributionally Robust Losses for Latent Covariate Mixturescited by 57
  5. 2018Stability and Convergence Trade-off of Iterative Optimization Algorithmscited by 53
  6. 2020Federated Learning Meets Multi-objective Optimizationcited by 50
  7. 2021Addressing Algorithmic Disparity and Performance Inconsistency in Federated Learningcited by 50
  8. 2021Enforcing fairness in private federated learning via the modified method of differential multiplierscited by 38
  9. 2022Minimax Demographic Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 24
  10. 2020Minimax Group Fairness: Algorithms and Experimentscited by 17
  11. 2021Unified Group Fairness on Federated Learningcited by 15
  12. 2022Fair Federated Learning via Bounded Group Losscited by 12
  13. 2022"You Can't Fix What You Can't Measure": Privately Measuring Demographic Performance Disparities in Federated Learningcited by 3
  14. 2017Scalable Annotation of Fine-Grained Categories Without Expertscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.