mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Meta Reinforcement Learning with Finite Training Tasks -- a Density Estimation Approach

arXiv 2206.10716 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In meta reinforcement learning (meta RL), an agent learns from a set of training tasks how to quickly solve a new task, drawn from the same task distribution. The optimal meta RL policy, a.k.a. the Bayes-optimal behavior, is well defined, and guarantees optimal reward in expectation, taken with respect to the task distribution. The question we explore in this work is how many training tasks are required to guarantee approximately optimal behavior with high probability. Recent work provided the first such PAC analysis for a model-free setting, where a history-dependent policy was learned from the training tasks. In this work, we propose a different approach: directly learn the task distribution, using density estimation techniques, and then train a policy on the learned task distribution. We show that our approach leads to bounds that depend on the dimension of the task distribution. In particular, in settings where the task distribution lies in a low-dimensional manifold, we extend our analysis to use dimensionality reduction techniques and account for such structure, obtaining significantly better bounds than previous work, which strictly depend on the number of states and actions. The key of our approach is the regularization implied by the kernel density estimation method. We further demonstrate that this regularization is useful in practice, when `plugged in' the state-of-the-art VariBAD meta RL algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2022.

Builds on

23 of 46 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  3. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  4. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  5. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 754
  6. 2019RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environmentcited by 689
  7. 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
  8. 2019Efficient Off-Policy Meta-Reinforcement Learning via Probabilistic Context Variablescited by 389
  9. 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation with Asynchronous Off-Policy Updatescited by 353
  10. 2018Learning to Drive in a Daycited by 273
  11. 2019VariBAD: A Very Good Method for Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learningcited by 217
  12. 2018Variational Autoencoders Pursue PCA Directions (by Accident)cited by 85
11 more
  1. 2020PACOH: Bayes-Optimal Meta-Learning with PAC-Guaranteescited by 85
  2. 2019Meta reinforcement learning as task inferencecited by 77
  3. 2017Meta-Learning by Adjusting Priors Based on Extended PAC-Bayes Theorycited by 76
  4. 2019Meta-learning of Sequential Strategiescited by 70
  5. 2021Meta-Learning with Fewer Tasks through Task Interpolationcited by 45
  6. 2021Bayesian decision-making under misspecified priors with applications to meta-learningcited by 44
  7. 2022On the Effectiveness of Fine-tuning Versus Meta-reinforcement Learningcited by 19
  8. 2019A Meta-MDP Approach to Exploration for Lifelong Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
  9. 2018Bayesian Policy Optimization for Model Uncertaintycited by 12
  10. 2021Improving Generalization in Meta-RL with Imaginary Tasks from Latent Dynamics Mixturecited by 12
  11. 2021Regularization Guarantees Generalization in Bayesian Reinforcement Learning through Algorithmic Stabilitycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.