mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Regularization Guarantees Generalization in Bayesian Reinforcement Learning through Algorithmic Stability

arXiv 2109.11792 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the Bayesian reinforcement learning (RL) setting, a prior distribution over the unknown problem parameters -- the rewards and transitions -- is assumed, and a policy that optimizes the (posterior) expected return is sought. A common approximation, which has been recently popularized as meta-RL, is to train the agent on a sample of N problem instances from the prior, with the hope that for large enough N, good generalization behavior to an unseen test instance will be obtained. In this work, we study generalization in Bayesian RL under the probably approximately correct (PAC) framework, using the method of algorithmic stability. Our main contribution is showing that by adding regularization, the optimal policy becomes stable in an appropriate sense. Most stability results in the literature build on strong convexity of the regularized loss -- an approach that is not suitable for RL as Markov decision processes (MDPs) are not convex. Instead, building on recent results of fast convergence rates for mirror descent in regularized MDPs, we show that regularized MDPs satisfy a certain quadratic growth criterion, which is sufficient to establish stability. This result, which may be of independent interest, allows us to study the effect of regularization on generalization in the Bayesian RL setting.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2021.

Builds on

21 of 41 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  3. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  4. 2020Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Pixelscited by 573
  5. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  6. 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 490
  7. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
  8. 2019Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learningcited by 478
  9. 2015Contextual Markov Decision Processescited by 213
  10. 2019VariBAD: A Very Good Method for Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learningcited by 210
  11. 2017A unified view of entropy-regularized Markov decision processescited by 174
  12. 2016Value Iteration Networkscited by 158
9 more
  1. 2015Taming the Noise in Reinforcement Learning via Soft Updatescited by 125
  2. 2019Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization: Global Convergence and Faster Rates for Regularized MDPscited by 113
  3. 2017Stability and Generalization of Learning Algorithms that Converge to Global Optimacited by 100
  4. 2020PACOH: Bayes-Optimal Meta-Learning with PAC-Guaranteescited by 85
  5. 2017Meta-Learning by Adjusting Priors Based on Extended PAC-Bayes Theorycited by 76
  6. 2021Meta-Learning with Fewer Tasks through Task Interpolationcited by 45
  7. 2020Generalized Planning With Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  8. 2021The Benefits of Implicit Regularization from SGD in Least Squares Problemscited by 32
  9. 2016What is the distribution of the number of unique original items in a bootstrap sample?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.