Enriching Abusive Language Detection with Community Context
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uses of pejorative expressions can be benign or actively empowering. When models for abuse detection misclassify these expressions as derogatory, they inadvertently censor productive conversations held by marginalized groups. One way to engage with non-dominant perspectives is to add context around conversations. Previous research has leveraged user- and thread-level features, but it often neglects the spaces within which productive conversations take place. Our paper highlights how community context can improve classification outcomes in abusive language detection. We make two main contributions to this end. First, we demonstrate that online communities cluster by the nature of their support towards victims of abuse. Second, we establish how community context improves accuracy and reduces the false positive rates of state-of-the-art abusive language classifiers. These findings suggest a promising direction for context-aware models in abusive language research.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2022.
Builds on
22 of 71 references.
References · 22
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
- 2020The Pushshift Reddit Datasetcited by 292
- 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 209
- 2020SemEval-2020 Task 12: Multilingual Offensive Language Identification in Social Media (OffensEval 2020)cited by 138
- 2020Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?cited by 93
- 2020Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanationcited by 84
- 2018Community Interaction and Conflict on the Webcited by 74
- 2017Detecting Online Hate Speech Using Context Aware Modelscited by 72
- 2020Demoting Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detectioncited by 62
- 2020Demographics Should Not Be the Reason of Toxicity: Mitigating Discrimination in Text Classifications with Instance Weightingcited by 41
- 2018A Unified Deep Learning Architecture for Abuse Detectioncited by 37
- 2017Mean Birds: Detecting Aggression and Bullying on Twittercited by 29
10 more
- 2021DeepHate: Hate Speech Detection via Multi-Faceted Text Representationscited by 29
- 2018Automatic Detection of Cyberbullying in Social Media Textcited by 26
- 2018Leveraging Intra-User and Inter-User Representation Learning for Automated Hate Speech Detectioncited by 25
- 2021The Structure of Toxic Conversations on Twittercited by 22
- 2016A Dictionary-based Approach to Racism Detection in Dutch Social Mediacited by 15
- 2018Context-Aware Attention for Understanding Twitter Abusecited by 9
- 2020Aggressive, Repetitive, Intentional, Visible, and Imbalanced: Refining Representations for Cyberbullying Classificationcited by 7
- 2019Neural Word Decomposition Models for Abusive Language Detectioncited by 6
- 2017Graph-based Features for Automatic Online Abuse Detectioncited by 5
- 2019Women, politics and Twitter: Using machine learning to change the discoursecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Don't Erase, Inform! Detecting and Contextualizing Harmful Language in Cultural Heritage Collectionscited by 2
- 2023When a Language Question Is at Stake. A Revisited Approach to Label Sensitive Contentcited by 0
- 2026Cyberbullying Governance on Social Media: A Unified Framework from Content Identification to Interventioncited by 0
- 2026Cyberbullying Governance on Social Media: A Unified Framework from Content Identification to Intervention26 May 2026
- 2025Don't Erase, Inform! Detecting and Contextualizing Harmful Language in Cultural Heritage Collections30 May 2025
- 2023When a Language Question Is at Stake. A Revisited Approach to Label Sensitive Content17 Nov 2023