Politics of Adversarial Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In addition to their security properties, adversarial machine-learning attacks and defenses have political dimensions. They enable or foreclose certain options for both the subjects of the machine learning systems and for those who deploy them, creating risks for civil liberties and human rights. In this paper, we draw on insights from science and technology studies, anthropology, and human rights literature, to inform how defenses against adversarial attacks can be used to suppress dissent and limit attempts to investigate machine learning systems. To make this concrete, we use real-world examples of how attacks such as perturbation, model inversion, or membership inference can be used for socially desirable ends. Although the predictions of this analysis may seem dire, there is hope. Efforts to address human rights concerns in the commercial spyware industry provide guidance for similar measures to ensure ML systems serve democratic, not authoritarian ends
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
12 papers.
- 2023Algorithmic Collective Action in Machine Learningcited by 30
- 2023FACE-AUDITOR: Data Auditing in Facial Recognition Systemscited by 15
- 2022Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Data through Cost and Utility Awarenesscited by 14
- 2025Statistical Collusion by Collectives on Learning Platformscited by 6
- 2021Adversarial for Good? How the Adversarial ML Community's Values Impede Socially Beneficial Uses of Attackscited by 5
- 2023Adversarial Machine Learning for Social Good: Reframing the Adversary as an Allycited by 5
- 2022Identifying Adversarial Attacks on Text Classifierscited by 4
- 2025Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Securitycited by 4
- 2023Online Algorithmic Recourse by Collective Actioncited by 3
- 2022Catastrophic overfitting can be induced with discriminative non-robust featurescited by 2
- 2021Addressing Privacy Threats from Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2021The Role of Social Movements, Coalitions, and Workers in Resisting Harmful Artificial Intelligence and Contributing to the Development of Responsible AIcited by 0
- 2025Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Security16 Jun 2025
- 2025Statistical Collusion by Collectives on Learning Platforms7 Feb 2025
- 2023Online Algorithmic Recourse by Collective Action29 Dec 2023
- 2023Adversarial Machine Learning for Social Good: Reframing the Adversary as an Ally5 Oct 2023
- 2023FACE-AUDITOR: Data Auditing in Facial Recognition Systems5 Apr 2023
- 2023Algorithmic Collective Action in Machine Learning8 Feb 2023
- 2022Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Data through Cost and Utility Awareness27 Aug 2022
- 2022Catastrophic overfitting can be induced with discriminative non-robust features16 Jun 2022
- 2022Identifying Adversarial Attacks on Text Classifiers21 Jan 2022
- 2021Addressing Privacy Threats from Machine Learning25 Oct 2021
- 2021The Role of Social Movements, Coalitions, and Workers in Resisting Harmful Artificial Intelligence and Contributing to the Development of Responsible AI11 Jul 2021
- 2021Adversarial for Good? How the Adversarial ML Community's Values Impede Socially Beneficial Uses of Attacks11 Jul 2021