mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Modeling the Machine Learning Multiverse

arXiv 2206.05985 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2022cs.LG stat.MEcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Amid mounting concern about the reliability and credibility of machine learning research, we present a principled framework for making robust and generalizable claims: the multiverse analysis. Our framework builds upon the multiverse analysis (Steegen et al., 2016) introduced in response to psychology's own reproducibility crisis. To efficiently explore high-dimensional and often continuous ML search spaces, we model the multiverse with a Gaussian Process surrogate and apply Bayesian experimental design. Our framework is designed to facilitate drawing robust scientific conclusions about model performance, and thus our approach focuses on exploration rather than conventional optimization. In the first of two case studies, we investigate disputed claims about the relative merit of adaptive optimizers. Second, we synthesize conflicting research on the effect of learning rate on the large batch training generalization gap. For the machine learning community, the multiverse analysis is a simple and effective technique for identifying robust claims, for increasing transparency, and a step toward improved reproducibility.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2022.

Builds on

43 of 89 references.

References · 43

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  6. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  7. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  8. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  9. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
  10. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  11. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
  12. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
31 more
  1. 2019Green AIcited by 620
  2. 2017Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networkscited by 529
  3. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
  4. 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
  5. 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 357
  6. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
  7. 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 313
  8. 2017Train longer, generalize better: closing the generalization gap in large batch training of neural networkscited by 278
  9. 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 270
  10. 2017Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Studycited by 267
  11. 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 248
  12. 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 215
  13. 2018Measuring the Effects of Data Parallelism on Neural Network Trainingcited by 190
  14. 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 181
  15. 2020Descending through a Crowded Valley - Benchmarking Deep Learning Optimizerscited by 118
  16. 2018Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarshipcited by 107
  17. 2017On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Modelscited by 103
  18. 2018Revisiting Small Batch Training for Deep Neural Networkscited by 100
  19. 2019On Empirical Comparisons of Optimizers for Deep Learningcited by 99
  20. 2021Do Transformer Modifications Transfer Across Implementations and Applications?cited by 87
  21. 2019A Step Toward Quantifying Independently Reproducible Machine Learning Researchcited by 77
  22. 2017Reporting Score Distributions Makes a Difference: Performance Study of LSTM-networks for Sequence Taggingcited by 71
  23. 2021Scientific Credibility of Machine Translation Research: A Meta-Evaluation of 769 Paperscited by 70
  24. 2016Practical heteroskedastic Gaussian process modeling for large simulation experimentscited by 38
  25. 2017AdaBatch: Adaptive Batch Sizes for Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 29
  26. 2017Replication or exploration? Sequential design for stochastic simulation experimentscited by 28
  27. 2018On the Computational Inefficiency of Large Batch Sizes for Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 25
  28. 2021Emulation of physical processes with Emukitcited by 24
  29. 2021Hyperparameter Optimization Is Deceiving Us, and How to Stop Itcited by 20
  30. 2019The Scientific Method in the Science of Machine Learningcited by 15
  31. 2021Perspectives on Machine Learning from Psychology's Reproducibility Crisiscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

11 papers.