Bounding and Approximating Intersectional Fairness through Marginal Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Discrimination in machine learning often arises along multiple dimensions (a.k.a. protected attributes); it is then desirable to ensure intersectional fairness -- i.e., that no subgroup is discriminated against. It is known that ensuring marginal fairness for every dimension independently is not sufficient in general. Due to the exponential number of subgroups, however, directly measuring intersectional fairness from data is impossible. In this paper, our primary goal is to understand in detail the relationship between marginal and intersectional fairness through statistical analysis. We first identify a set of sufficient conditions under which an exact relationship can be obtained. Then, we prove bounds (easily computable through marginal fairness and other meaningful statistical quantities) in high-probability on intersectional fairness in the general case. Beyond their descriptive value, we show that these theoretical bounds can be leveraged to derive a heuristic improving the approximation and bounds of intersectional fairness by choosing, in a relevant manner, protected attributes for which we describe intersectional subgroups. Finally, we test the performance of our approximations and bounds on real and synthetic data-sets.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2022.
Builds on
11 of 38 references.
References · 11
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 153
- 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 127
- 2018An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 81
- 2020Achieving Equalized Odds by Resampling Sensitive Attributescited by 42
- 2020Can I Trust My Fairness Metric? Assessing Fairness with Unlabeled Data and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
- 2021Assessing Fairness in the Presence of Missing Datacited by 24
- 2018Bayesian Modeling of Intersectional Fairness: The Variance of Biascited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2023A Survey on Intersectional Fairness in Machine Learning: Notions, Mitigation, and Challengescited by 41
- 2023Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairnesscited by 26
- 2024A structured regression approach for evaluating model performance across intersectional subgroupscited by 9
- 2024The Intersectionality Problem for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 5
- 2025Machine Learning with Multitype Protected Attributes: Intersectional Fairness through Regularisationcited by 3
- 2023Trading-off price for data quality to achieve fair online allocationcited by 2
- 2025Size-adaptive Hypothesis Testing for Fairnesscited by 1
- 2025Doubly-Regressing Approach for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 1
- 2026Intersectional Fairness via Mixed-Integer Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026COVAriance-Induced Fairness Gap Penalty for Subgroup-Fair Clusteringcited by 0
- 2026Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Levelcited by 0
- 2026Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Level7 Aug 2026
- 2026COVAriance-Induced Fairness Gap Penalty for Subgroup-Fair Clustering20 Jul 2026
- 2026Intersectional Fairness via Mixed-Integer Optimization27 Jan 2026
- 2025Doubly-Regressing Approach for Subgroup Fairness24 Oct 2025
- 2025Machine Learning with Multitype Protected Attributes: Intersectional Fairness through Regularisation9 Sep 2025
- 2025Size-adaptive Hypothesis Testing for Fairness12 Jun 2025
- 2024The Intersectionality Problem for Algorithmic Fairness4 Nov 2024
- 2024A structured regression approach for evaluating model performance across intersectional subgroups26 Jan 2024
- 2023Trading-off price for data quality to achieve fair online allocation23 Jun 2023
- 2023A Survey on Intersectional Fairness in Machine Learning: Notions, Mitigation, and Challenges11 May 2023
- 2023Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness16 Mar 2023