mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bounding and Approximating Intersectional Fairness through Marginal Fairness

arXiv 2206.05828 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2022stat.ML cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Discrimination in machine learning often arises along multiple dimensions (a.k.a. protected attributes); it is then desirable to ensure intersectional fairness -- i.e., that no subgroup is discriminated against. It is known that ensuring marginal fairness for every dimension independently is not sufficient in general. Due to the exponential number of subgroups, however, directly measuring intersectional fairness from data is impossible. In this paper, our primary goal is to understand in detail the relationship between marginal and intersectional fairness through statistical analysis. We first identify a set of sufficient conditions under which an exact relationship can be obtained. Then, we prove bounds (easily computable through marginal fairness and other meaningful statistical quantities) in high-probability on intersectional fairness in the general case. Beyond their descriptive value, we show that these theoretical bounds can be leveraged to derive a heuristic improving the approximation and bounds of intersectional fairness by choosing, in a relevant manner, protected attributes for which we describe intersectional subgroups. Finally, we test the performance of our approximations and bounds on real and synthetic data-sets.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2022.

Builds on

11 of 38 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  3. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  4. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
  5. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 153
  6. 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 127
  7. 2018An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 81
  8. 2020Achieving Equalized Odds by Resampling Sensitive Attributescited by 42
  9. 2020Can I Trust My Fairness Metric? Assessing Fairness with Unlabeled Data and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
  10. 2021Assessing Fairness in the Presence of Missing Datacited by 24
  11. 2018Bayesian Modeling of Intersectional Fairness: The Variance of Biascited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

11 papers.