Doubly-Regressing Approach for Subgroup Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithmic fairness is a socially crucial topic in real-world applications of AI. Among many notions of fairness, subgroup fairness is widely studied when multiple sensitive attributes (e.g., gender, race, age) are present. However, as the number of sensitive attributes grows, the number of subgroups increases accordingly, creating heavy computational burdens and data sparsity problem (subgroups with too small sizes). In this paper, we develop a novel learning algorithm for subgroup fairness which resolves these issues by focusing on subgroups with sufficient sample sizes as well as marginal fairness (fairness for each sensitive attribute). To this end, we formalize a notion of subgroup-subset fairness and introduce a corresponding distributional fairness measure called the supremum Integral Probability Metric (supIPM). Building on this formulation, we propose the Doubly Regressing Adversarial learning for subgroup Fairness (DRAF) algorithm, which reduces a surrogate fairness gap for supIPM with much less computation than directly reducing supIPM. Theoretically, we prove that the proposed surrogate fairness gap is an upper bound of supIPM. Empirically, we show that the DRAF algorithm outperforms baseline methods in benchmark datasets, specifically when the number of sensitive attributes is large so that many subgroups are very small.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.
Builds on
24 of 37 references.
References · 24
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
- 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
- 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 126
- 2020Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 99
12 more
- 2018An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 81
- 2022On Learning Fairness and Accuracy on Multiple Subgroupscited by 31
- 2017Calibration for the (Computationally-Identifiable) Massescited by 23
- 2018Bayesian Modeling of Intersectional Fairness: The Variance of Biascited by 23
- 2022Learning fair representation with a parametric integral probability metriccited by 20
- 2022Bounding and Approximating Intersectional Fairness through Marginal Fairnesscited by 11
- 2021Fair Tree Classifier using Strong Demographic Paritycited by 9
- 2023A Sequentially Fair Mechanism for Multiple Sensitive Attributescited by 8
- 2025Fair Representation Learning for Continuous Sensitive Attributes using Expectation of Integral Probability Metricscited by 7
- 2025Fairness Through Matchingcited by 6
- 2022A Manifold Two-Sample Test Study: Integral Probability Metric with Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2024FairICP: Encouraging Equalized Odds via Inverse Conditional Permutationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.