mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bayesian Modeling of Intersectional Fairness: The Variance of Bias

arXiv 1811.07255 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2018cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Intersectionality is a framework that analyzes how interlocking systems of power and oppression affect individuals along overlapping dimensions including race, gender, sexual orientation, class, and disability. Intersectionality theory therefore implies it is important that fairness in artificial intelligence systems be protected with regard to multi-dimensional protected attributes. However, the measurement of fairness becomes statistically challenging in the multi-dimensional setting due to data sparsity, which increases rapidly in the number of dimensions, and in the values per dimension. We present a Bayesian probabilistic modeling approach for the reliable, data-efficient estimation of fairness with multi-dimensional protected attributes, which we apply to two existing intersectional fairness metrics. Experimental results on census data and the COMPAS criminal justice recidivism dataset demonstrate the utility of our methodology, and show that Bayesian methods are valuable for the modeling and measurement of fairness in an intersectional context.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
  2. 2023A Survey on Intersectional Fairness in Machine Learning: Notions, Mitigation, and Challengescited by 41
  3. 2021FARF: A Fair and Adaptive Random Forests Classifiercited by 37
  4. 2023Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairnesscited by 26
  5. 2021InfoFair: Information-Theoretic Intersectional Fairnesscited by 15
  6. 2023Multi-dimensional discrimination in Law and Machine Learning -- A comparative overviewcited by 15
  7. 2022Bounding and Approximating Intersectional Fairness through Marginal Fairnesscited by 11
  8. 2024A structured regression approach for evaluating model performance across intersectional subgroupscited by 8
  9. 2022Fairness Implications of Encoding Protected Categorical Attributescited by 7
  10. 2021FairBalance: How to Achieve Equalized Odds With Data Pre-processingcited by 5
  11. 2023Fairness Hacking: The Malicious Practice of Shrouding Unfairness in Algorithmscited by 5
  12. 2024The Intersectionality Problem for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 5
11 more
  1. 2021User Acceptance of Gender Stereotypes in Automated Career Recommendationscited by 4
  2. 2025Unmasking Gender Bias in Recommendation Systems and Enhancing Category-Aware Fairnesscited by 3
  3. 2022A Survey on Preserving Fairness Guarantees in Changing Environmentscited by 2
  4. 2024Fairness at Every Intersection: Uncovering and Mitigating Intersectional Biases in Multimodal Clinical Predictionscited by 2
  5. 2022Fair Inference for Discrete Latent Variable Modelscited by 1
  6. 2023Uncertainty in Fairness Assessment: Maintaining Stable Conclusions Despite Fluctuationscited by 1
  7. 2025Size-adaptive Hypothesis Testing for Fairnesscited by 1
  8. 2025Doubly-Regressing Approach for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 1
  9. 2023Intersectional Fairness: A Fractal Approachcited by 0
  10. 2024(Un)certainty of (Un)fairness: Preference-Based Selection of Certainly Fair Decision-Makerscited by 0
  11. 2026Towards Provably Fair Machine Learning: Bayesian Approaches For Consistent and Transparent Predictionscited by 0