Teacher Perception of Automatically Extracted Grammar Concepts for L2 Language Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One of the challenges of language teaching is how to organize the rules regarding syntax, semantics, or phonology of the language in a meaningful manner. This not only requires pedagogical skills, but also requires a deep understanding of that language. While comprehensive materials to develop such curricula are available in English and some broadly spoken languages, for many other languages, teachers need to manually create them in response to their students' needs. This process is challenging because i) it requires that such experts be accessible and have the necessary resources, and ii) even if there are such experts, describing all the intricacies of a language is time-consuming and prone to omission. In this article, we present an automatic framework that aims to facilitate this process by automatically discovering and visualizing descriptions of different aspects of grammar. Specifically, we extract descriptions from a natural text corpus that answer questions about morphosyntax (learning of word order, agreement, case marking, or word formation) and semantics (learning of vocabulary) and show illustrative examples. We apply this method for teaching the Indian languages, Kannada and Marathi, which, unlike English, do not have well-developed pedagogical resources and, therefore, are likely to benefit from this exercise. To assess the perceived utility of the extracted material, we enlist the help of language educators from schools in North America who teach these languages to perform a manual evaluation. Overall, teachers find the materials to be interesting as a reference material for their own lesson preparation or even for learner evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2022.
Builds on
12 of 75 references.
References · 12
- 2016End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRFcited by 341
- 2021Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasetscited by 243
- 2021Word Alignment by Fine-tuning Embeddings on Parallel Corporacited by 186
- 2021Samanantar: The Largest Publicly Available Parallel Corpora Collection for 11 Indic Languagescited by 136
- 201975 Languages, 1 Model: Parsing Universal Dependencies Universallycited by 90
- 2016Simple and Accurate Dependency Parsing Using Bidirectional LSTM Feature Representationscited by 55
- 2019Deep Contextualized Word Embeddings in Transition-Based and Graph-Based Dependency Parsing -- A Tale of Two Parsers Revisitedcited by 13
- 2022A Baseline Readability Model for Cebuanocited by 10
- 2020Automatic Extraction of Rules Governing Morphological Agreementcited by 9
- 2021When is Wall a Pared and when a Muro? -- Extracting Rules Governing Lexical Selectioncited by 5
- 2017Fine-Grained Prediction of Syntactic Typology: Discovering Latent Structure with Supervised Learningcited by 4
- 2022AUTOLEX: An Automatic Framework for Linguistic Explorationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
3 papers.