Automatic Extraction of Rules Governing Morphological Agreement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Creating a descriptive grammar of a language is an indispensable step for language documentation and preservation. However, at the same time it is a tedious, time-consuming task. In this paper, we take steps towards automating this process by devising an automated framework for extracting a first-pass grammatical specification from raw text in a concise, human- and machine-readable format. We focus on extracting rules describing agreement, a morphosyntactic phenomenon at the core of the grammars of many of the world's languages. We apply our framework to all languages included in the Universal Dependencies project, with promising results. Using cross-lingual transfer, even with no expert annotations in the language of interest, our framework extracts a grammatical specification which is nearly equivalent to those created with large amounts of gold-standard annotated data. We confirm this finding with human expert evaluations of the rules that our framework produces, which have an average accuracy of 78%. We release an interface demonstrating the extracted rules at https://neulab.github.io/lase/.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2025MultiBLiMP 1.0: A Massively Multilingual Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairscited by 65
- 2021Evaluating the Morphosyntactic Well-formedness of Generated Textscited by 8
- 2022CaMEL: Case Marker Extraction without Labelscited by 3
- 2022AUTOLEX: An Automatic Framework for Linguistic Explorationcited by 3
- 2022Teacher Perception of Automatically Extracted Grammar Concepts for L2 Language Learningcited by 3
- 2021Minor changes make a difference: a case study on the consistency of UD-based dependency parserscited by 2
- 2026Speaking of Language: Reflections on Metalanguage Research in NLPcited by 1
- 2023Teacher Perception of Automatically Extracted Grammar Concepts for L2 Language Learningcited by 0
- 2026LLM Agents as Computational Typologistscited by 0
- 2026LLM Agents as Computational Typologists7 Sep 2026
- 2026Speaking of Language: Reflections on Metalanguage Research in NLP3 Apr 2026
- 2025MultiBLiMP 1.0: A Massively Multilingual Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs3 Apr 2025
- 2023Teacher Perception of Automatically Extracted Grammar Concepts for L2 Language Learning27 Oct 2023
- 2022Teacher Perception of Automatically Extracted Grammar Concepts for L2 Language Learning10 Jun 2022
- 2022AUTOLEX: An Automatic Framework for Linguistic Exploration25 Mar 2022
- 2022CaMEL: Case Marker Extraction without Labels18 Mar 2022
- 2021Minor changes make a difference: a case study on the consistency of UD-based dependency parsers30 Nov 2021
- 2021Evaluating the Morphosyntactic Well-formedness of Generated Texts30 Mar 2021