mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Syntactic Inductive Biases for Deep Learning Methods

arXiv 2206.04806 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this thesis, we try to build a connection between the two schools by introducing syntactic inductive biases for deep learning models. We propose two families of inductive biases, one for constituency structure and another one for dependency structure. The constituency inductive bias encourages deep learning models to use different units (or neurons) to separately process long-term and short-term information. This separation provides a way for deep learning models to build the latent hierarchical representations from sequential inputs, that a higher-level representation is composed of and can be decomposed into a series of lower-level representations. For example, without knowing the ground-truth structure, our proposed model learns to process logical expression through composing representations of variables and operators into representations of expressions according to its syntactic structure. On the other hand, the dependency inductive bias encourages models to find the latent relations between entities in the input sequence. For natural language, the latent relations are usually modeled as a directed dependency graph, where a word has exactly one parent node and zero or several children nodes. After applying this constraint to a Transformer-like model, we find the model is capable of inducing directed graphs that are close to human expert annotations, and it also outperforms the standard transformer model on different tasks. We believe that these experimental results demonstrate an interesting alternative for the future development of deep learning models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 76 of its 185 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2022.

Builds on

76 of 185 references.

References · 76

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  6. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  7. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  8. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  9. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  10. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  11. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  12. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
38 more
  1. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  2. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,499
  3. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,120
  4. 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,026
  5. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
  6. 2020Long Range Arena: A Benchmark for Efficient Transformerscited by 700
  7. 2018Universal Transformerscited by 647
  8. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 644
  9. 2013Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 554
  10. 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 432
  11. 2019Relay Policy Learning: Solving Long-Horizon Tasks via Imitation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 384
  12. 2014Memory Networkscited by 363
  13. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
  14. 2017FeUdal Networks for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
  15. 2015Improved Semantic Representations From Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networkscited by 306
  16. 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 242
  17. 2016A Decomposable Attention Model for Natural Language Inferencecited by 215
  18. 2017Regularizing and Optimizing LSTM Language Modelscited by 205
  19. 2014Recurrent Neural Network Regularizationcited by 189
  20. 2020A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 165
  21. 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
  22. 2017Breaking the Softmax Bottleneck: A High-Rank RNN Language Modelcited by 152
  23. 2019Language as an Abstraction for Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 138
  24. 2018ListOps: A Diagnostic Dataset for Latent Tree Learningcited by 129
  25. 2018Variational Option Discovery Algorithmscited by 122
  26. 2016Hierarchical Multiscale Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 104
  27. 2017On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Modelscited by 104
  28. 2018Ordered Neurons: Integrating Tree Structures into Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 101
  29. 2016Tying Word Vectors and Word Classifiers: A Loss Framework for Language Modelingcited by 92
  30. 2019Do Attention Heads in BERT Track Syntactic Dependencies?cited by 88
  31. 2021Coordination Among Neural Modules Through a Shared Global Workspacecited by 85
  32. 2016Improving Neural Language Models with a Continuous Cachecited by 82
  33. 2020UDapter: Language Adaptation for Truly Universal Dependency Parsingcited by 77
  34. 2014A Clockwork RNNcited by 72
  35. 2018Linguistically-Informed Self-Attention for Semantic Role Labelingcited by 71
  36. 2019Unsupervised Latent Tree Induction with Deep Inside-Outside Recursive Autoencoderscited by 60
  37. 2017Neural Language Modeling by Jointly Learning Syntax and Lexiconcited by 57
  38. 2017Multi-Level Discovery of Deep Optionscited by 51

50 most cited of 76 All 76 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.