A Randomized Approach for Tight Privacy Accounting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bounding privacy leakage over compositions, i.e., privacy accounting, is a key challenge in differential privacy (DP). The privacy parameter (eps or δ) is often easy to estimate but hard to bound. In this paper, we propose a new differential privacy paradigm called estimate-verify-release (EVR), which addresses the challenges of providing a strict upper bound for privacy parameter in DP compositions by converting an estimate of privacy parameter into a formal guarantee. The EVR paradigm first estimates the privacy parameter of a mechanism, then verifies whether it meets this guarantee, and finally releases the query output based on the verification result. The core component of the EVR is privacy verification. We develop a randomized privacy verifier using Monte Carlo (MC) technique. Furthermore, we propose an MC-based DP accountant that outperforms existing DP accounting techniques in terms of accuracy and efficiency. Our empirical evaluation shows the newly proposed EVR paradigm improves the utility-privacy tradeoff for privacy-preserving machine learning.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2023.
Builds on
26 of 51 references.
References · 26
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 999
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
- 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 218
- 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 199
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 180
- 2020The Discrete Gaussian for Differential Privacycited by 135
- 2019Deep Learning with Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 114
- 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 86
14 more
- 2022Connect the Dots: Tighter Discrete Approximations of Privacy Loss Distributionscited by 52
- 2020Tight Differential Privacy for Discrete-Valued Mechanisms and for the Subsampled Gaussian Mechanism Using FFTcited by 43
- 2016Privacy Odometers and Filters: Pay-as-you-Go Compositioncited by 33
- 2020Three Variants of Differential Privacy: Lossless Conversion and Applicationscited by 26
- 2022A General Framework for Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 25
- 2021Computing Differential Privacy Guarantees for Heterogeneous Compositions Using FFTcited by 20
- 2022Optimal Membership Inference Bounds for Adaptive Composition of Sampled Gaussian Mechanismscited by 19
- 2018Property Testing for Differential Privacycited by 16
- 2022Faster Privacy Accounting via Evolving Discretizationcited by 15
- 2022Edgeworth Accountant: An Analytical Approach to Differential Privacy Compositioncited by 14
- 2022Generalized PTR: User-Friendly Recipes for Data-Adaptive Algorithms with Differential Privacycited by 6
- 2022The Saddle-Point Accountant for Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2022Renyi Differential Privacy of Propose-Test-Release and Applications to Private and Robust Machine Learningcited by 4
- 2022On the (Im)Possibility of Estimating Various Notions of Differential Privacycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2024Private Fine-tuning of Large Language Models with Zeroth-order Optimizationcited by 41
- 2024Auditing f-Differential Privacy in One Runcited by 30
- 2024How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?cited by 22
- 2023Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacycited by 15
- 2024Balls-and-Bins Sampling for DP-SGDcited by 14
- 2024Avoiding Pitfalls for Privacy Accounting of Subsampled Mechanisms under Compositioncited by 13
- 2026Sampling-Free Privacy Accounting for Matrix Mechanisms under Random Allocationcited by 3
- 2025Machine Learning with Privacy for Protected Attributescited by 2
- 2026Less Random, More Private: What is the Optimal Subsampling Scheme for DP-SGD?cited by 2
- 2025Auditing Differential Privacy in the Black-Box Settingcited by 0
- 2026When Are Trade-Off Functions Testable from Finite Samples?cited by 0
- 2026When Are Trade-Off Functions Testable from Finite Samples?11 May 2026
- 2026Less Random, More Private: What is the Optimal Subsampling Scheme for DP-SGD?8 May 2026
- 2026Sampling-Free Privacy Accounting for Matrix Mechanisms under Random Allocation29 Jan 2026
- 2025Machine Learning with Privacy for Protected Attributes24 Jun 2025
- 2025Auditing Differential Privacy in the Black-Box Setting15 Mar 2025
- 2024Balls-and-Bins Sampling for DP-SGD21 Dec 2024
- 2024Auditing f-Differential Privacy in One Run29 Oct 2024
- 2024Avoiding Pitfalls for Privacy Accounting of Subsampled Mechanisms under Composition27 May 2024
- 2024How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?26 Mar 2024
- 2024Private Fine-tuning of Large Language Models with Zeroth-order Optimization9 Jan 2024
- 2023Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacy8 Jul 2023