mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Identifying good directions to escape the NTK regime and efficiently learn low-degree plus sparse polynomials

arXiv 2206.03688 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A recent goal in the theory of deep learning is to identify how neural networks can escape the "lazy training," or Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) regime, where the network is coupled with its first order Taylor expansion at initialization. While the NTK is minimax optimal for learning dense polynomials (Ghorbani et al, 2021), it cannot learn features, and hence has poor sample complexity for learning many classes of functions including sparse polynomials. Recent works have thus aimed to identify settings where gradient based algorithms provably generalize better than the NTK. One such example is the "QuadNTK" approach of Bai and Lee (2020), which analyzes the second-order term in the Taylor expansion. Bai and Lee (2020) show that the second-order term can learn sparse polynomials efficiently; however, it sacrifices the ability to learn general dense polynomials. In this paper, we analyze how gradient descent on a two-layer neural network can escape the NTK regime by utilizing a spectral characterization of the NTK (Montanari and Zhong, 2020) and building on the QuadNTK approach. We first expand upon the spectral analysis to identify "good" directions in parameter space in which we can move without harming generalization. Next, we show that a wide two-layer neural network can jointly use the NTK and QuadNTK to fit target functions consisting of a dense low-degree term and a sparse high-degree term -- something neither the NTK nor the QuadNTK can do on their own. Finally, we construct a regularizer which encourages our parameter vector to move in the "good" directions, and show that gradient descent on the regularized loss will converge to a global minimizer, which also has low test error. This yields an end to end convergence and generalization guarantee with provable sample complexity improvement over both the NTK and QuadNTK on their own.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2022.

Builds on

38 of 54 references.

References · 38

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  2. 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 787
  3. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 738
  4. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 675
  5. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 659
  6. 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 574
  7. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 573
  8. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 566
  9. 2018Learning and Generalization in Overparameterized Neural Networks, Going Beyond Two Layerscited by 340
  10. 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 306
  11. 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 285
  12. 2018Learning Overparameterized Neural Networks via Stochastic Gradient Descent on Structured Datacited by 261
26 more
  1. 2021Deep learning: a statistical viewpointcited by 240
  2. 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 222
  3. 2020Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 157
  4. 2019Linearized two-layers neural networks in high dimensioncited by 155
  5. 2020When Do Neural Networks Outperform Kernel Methods?cited by 150
  6. 2019Neural Tangents: Fast and Easy Infinite Neural Networks in Pythoncited by 149
  7. 2018Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimizes Over-parameterized Deep ReLU Networkscited by 141
  8. 2018Regularization Matters: Generalization and Optimization of Neural Nets v.s. their Induced Kernelcited by 131
  9. 2017Theoretical insights into the optimization landscape of over-parameterized shallow neural networkscited by 128
  10. 2016Matrix Completion has No Spurious Local Minimumcited by 125
  11. 2020Spectral Methods for Data Science: A Statistical Perspectivecited by 112
  12. 2021Generalization error of random features and kernel methods: hypercontractivity and kernel matrix concentrationcited by 110
  13. 2019On the Power and Limitations of Random Features for Understanding Neural Networkscited by 103
  14. 2018On the Power of Over-parametrization in Neural Networks with Quadratic Activationcited by 102
  15. 2019Dynamics of Deep Neural Networks and Neural Tangent Hierarchycited by 96
  16. 2019What Can ResNet Learn Efficiently, Going Beyond Kernels?cited by 91
  17. 2019Limitations of Lazy Training of Two-layers Neural Networkscited by 87
  18. 2020The Interpolation Phase Transition in Neural Networks: Memorization and Generalization under Lazy Trainingcited by 84
  19. 2017Learning One-hidden-layer Neural Networks with Landscape Designcited by 81
  20. 2019Beyond Linearization: On Quadratic and Higher-Order Approximation of Wide Neural Networkscited by 79
  21. 2020Learning Parities with Neural Networkscited by 78
  22. 2020The Surprising Simplicity of the Early-Time Learning Dynamics of Neural Networkscited by 58
  23. 2020Towards Understanding Hierarchical Learning: Benefits of Neural Representationscited by 46
  24. 2021Quantifying the Benefit of Using Differentiable Learning over Tangent Kernelscited by 41
  25. 2021The Three Stages of Learning Dynamics in High-Dimensional Kernel Methodscited by 22
  26. 2020Taylorized Training: Towards Better Approximation of Neural Network Training at Finite Widthcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 7; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort: