Adaptive Adversarial Training to Improve Adversarial Robustness of DNNs for Medical Image Segmentation and Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is known that Deep Neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, and the adversarial robustness of DNNs could be improved by adding adversarial noises to training data (e.g., the standard adversarial training (SAT)). However, inappropriate noises added to training data may reduce a model's performance, which is termed the trade-off between accuracy and robustness. This problem has been sufficiently studied for the classification of whole images but has rarely been explored for image analysis tasks in the medical application domain, including image segmentation, landmark detection, and object detection tasks. In this study, we show that, for those medical image analysis tasks, the SAT method has a severe issue that limits its practical use: it generates a fixed and unified level of noise for all training samples for robust DNN training. A high noise level may lead to a large reduction in model performance and a low noise level may not be effective in improving robustness. To resolve this issue, we design an adaptive-margin adversarial training (AMAT) method that generates sample-wise adaptive adversarial noises for robust DNN training. In contrast to the existing, classification-oriented adversarial training methods, our AMAT method uses a loss-defined-margin strategy so that it can be applied to different tasks as long as the loss functions are well-defined. We successfully apply our AMAT method to state-of-the-art DNNs, using five publicly available datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that: (1) our AMAT method can be applied to the three seemingly different tasks in the medical image application domain; (2) AMAT outperforms the SAT method in adversarial robustness; (3) AMAT has a minimal reduction in prediction accuracy on clean data, compared with the SAT method; and (4) AMAT has almost the same training time cost as SAT.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2022.
Builds on
33 of 42 references.
References · 33
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
- 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 555
- 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
21 more
- 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 460
- 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 373
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detectioncited by 275
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
- 2018Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attackscited by 221
- 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
- 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 172
- 2021On the Convergence and Robustness of Adversarial Trainingcited by 130
- 2017On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attackscited by 126
- 2018Curriculum Adversarial Trainingcited by 89
- 2020CAT: Customized Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 61
- 2019Towards Adversarially Robust Object Detectioncited by 55
- 2019Instance adaptive adversarial training: Improved accuracy tradeoffs in neural netscited by 55
- 2017Houdini: Fooling Deep Structured Prediction Modelscited by 50
- 2019Impact of Adversarial Examples on Deep Learning Models for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 26
- 2018Defending Against Universal Perturbations With Shared Adversarial Trainingcited by 25
- 2018Generalizability vs. Robustness: Adversarial Examples for Medical Imagingcited by 23
- 2020Miss the Point: Targeted Adversarial Attack on Multiple Landmark Detectioncited by 21
- 2021Towards Robust General Medical Image Segmentationcited by 14
- 2020Increasing-Margin Adversarial (IMA) Training to Improve Adversarial Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2021A Regularization Method to Improve Adversarial Robustness of Neural Networks for ECG Signal Classificationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Survey on Adversarial Attack and Defense for Medical Image Analysis: Methods and Challengescited by 17
- 2026PVminer: A Domain-Specific Tool to Detect the Patient Voice in Patient Generated Datacited by 3
- 2025A Comprehensive Study on Medical Image Segmentation using Deep Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2024Dynamic Perturbation-Adaptive Adversarial Training on Medical Image Classificationcited by 0
- 2026PVminer: A Domain-Specific Tool to Detect the Patient Voice in Patient Generated Data24 Feb 2026
- 2025A Comprehensive Study on Medical Image Segmentation using Deep Neural Networks4 Jun 2025
- 2024Dynamic Perturbation-Adaptive Adversarial Training on Medical Image Classification11 Mar 2024
- 2023Survey on Adversarial Attack and Defense for Medical Image Analysis: Methods and Challenges24 Mar 2023