Incentivizing Combinatorial Bandit Exploration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Consider a bandit algorithm that recommends actions to self-interested users in a recommendation system. The users are free to choose other actions and need to be incentivized to follow the algorithm's recommendations. While the users prefer to exploit, the algorithm can incentivize them to explore by leveraging the information collected from the previous users. All published work on this problem, known as incentivized exploration, focuses on small, unstructured action sets and mainly targets the case when the users' beliefs are independent across actions. However, realistic exploration problems often feature large, structured action sets and highly correlated beliefs. We focus on a paradigmatic exploration problem with structure: combinatorial semi-bandits. We prove that Thompson Sampling, when applied to combinatorial semi-bandits, is incentive-compatible when initialized with a sufficient number of samples of each arm (where this number is determined in advance by the Bayesian prior). Moreover, we design incentive-compatible algorithms for collecting the initial samples.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2022.
Builds on
15 of 34 references.
References · 15
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 481
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 433
- 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 256
- 2014An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Thompson Samplingcited by 178
- 2018Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 78
- 2015Bayesian Incentive-Compatible Bandit Explorationcited by 53
- 2013Thompson Sampling for Complex Bandit Problemscited by 43
- 2016Bayesian Exploration: Incentivizing Exploration in Bayesian Gamescited by 37
- 2014Efficient Learning in Large-Scale Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 36
- 2014Matroid Bandits: Fast Combinatorial Optimization with Learningcited by 30
- 2020The Price of Incentivizing Exploration: A Characterization via Thompson Sampling and Sample Complexitycited by 26
- 2016Combinatorial semi-bandit with known covariancecited by 24
3 more
- 2018Incentivizing Exploration with Selective Data Disclosurecited by 24
- 2021Learning to Persuade on the Fly: Robustness Against Ignorancecited by 12
- 2015Economic Recommendation Systemscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024Incentivized Learning in Principal-Agent Bandit Gamescited by 13
- 2023Strategic Apple Tastingcited by 10
- 2023Incentivizing Exploration with Linear Contexts and Combinatorial Actionscited by 5
- 2023When Are Two Lists Better than One?: Benefits and Harms in Joint Decision-makingcited by 4
- 2024Incentivized Exploration via Filtered Posterior Samplingcited by 2
- 2024Incentivized Exploration with Stochastic Covariates: A Two-Stage Mechanism Design for Recommender Systemcited by 1
- 2023Incentive-Aware Synthetic Control: Accurate Counterfactual Estimation via Incentivized Explorationcited by 0
- 2025Geometry Meets Incentives: Sample-Efficient Incentivized Exploration with Linear Contextscited by 0
- 2026Prior-Agnostic Incentive-Compatible Explorationcited by 0
- 2026Prior-Agnostic Incentive-Compatible Exploration24 Feb 2026
- 2025Geometry Meets Incentives: Sample-Efficient Incentivized Exploration with Linear Contexts2 Jun 2025
- 2024Incentivized Exploration with Stochastic Covariates: A Two-Stage Mechanism Design for Recommender System4 Jun 2024
- 2024Incentivized Learning in Principal-Agent Bandit Games6 Mar 2024
- 2024Incentivized Exploration via Filtered Posterior Sampling20 Feb 2024
- 2023Incentive-Aware Synthetic Control: Accurate Counterfactual Estimation via Incentivized Exploration26 Dec 2023
- 2023When Are Two Lists Better than One?: Benefits and Harms in Joint Decision-making22 Aug 2023
- 2023Strategic Apple Tasting9 Jun 2023
- 2023Incentivizing Exploration with Linear Contexts and Combinatorial Actions3 Jun 2023