mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Machine Translation Robustness to Natural Asemantic Variation

arXiv 2205.12514 ↗First posted 25 May 2022cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current Machine Translation (MT) models still struggle with more challenging input, such as noisy data and tail-end words and phrases. Several works have addressed this robustness issue by identifying specific categories of noise and variation then tuning models to perform better on them. An important yet under-studied category involves minor variations in nuance (non-typos) that preserve meaning w.r.t. the target language. We introduce and formalize this category as Natural Asemantic Variation (NAV) and investigate it in the context of MT robustness. We find that existing MT models fail when presented with NAV data, but we demonstrate strategies to improve performance on NAV by fine-tuning them with human-generated variations. We also show that NAV robustness can be transferred across languages and find that synthetic perturbations can achieve some but not all of the benefits of organic NAV data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2022.

Builds on

22 of 29 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  4. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  5. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,488
  6. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 788
  7. 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 561
  8. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 306
  9. 2020Improving Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation and Zero-Shot Translationcited by 277
  10. 2019CCMatrix: Mining Billions of High-Quality Parallel Sentences on the WEBcited by 177
  11. 2019CCAligned: A Massive Collection of Cross-Lingual Web-Document Pairscited by 136
  12. 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
10 more
  1. 2019Text Processing Like Humans Do: Visually Attacking and Shielding NLP Systemscited by 101
  2. 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
  3. 2018SwitchOut: an Efficient Data Augmentation Algorithm for Neural Machine Translationcited by 72
  4. 2018MTNT: A Testbed for Machine Translation of Noisy Textcited by 54
  5. 2019Training on Synthetic Noise Improves Robustness to Natural Noise in Machine Translationcited by 52
  6. 2021Robust Open-Vocabulary Translation from Visual Text Representationscited by 47
  7. 2019ParaBank: Monolingual Bitext Generation and Sentential Paraphrasing via Lexically-constrained Neural Machine Translationcited by 38
  8. 2020Evaluating Robustness to Input Perturbations for Neural Machine Translationcited by 36
  9. 2020Simulated Multiple Reference Training Improves Low-Resource Machine Translationcited by 22
  10. 2019Machine Translation of Restaurant Reviews: New Corpus for Domain Adaptation and Robustnesscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.