mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Alleviating Robust Overfitting of Adversarial Training With Consistency Regularization

arXiv 2205.11744 ↗First posted 24 May 2022cs.LG cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial training (AT) has proven to be one of the most effective ways to defend Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) against adversarial attacks. However, the phenomenon of robust overfitting, i.e., the robustness will drop sharply at a certain stage, always exists during AT. It is of great importance to decrease this robust generalization gap in order to obtain a robust model. In this paper, we present an in-depth study towards the robust overfitting from a new angle. We observe that consistency regularization, a popular technique in semi-supervised learning, has a similar goal as AT and can be used to alleviate robust overfitting. We empirically validate this observation, and find a majority of prior solutions have implicit connections to consistency regularization. Motivated by this, we introduce a new AT solution, which integrates the consistency regularization and Mean Teacher (MT) strategy into AT. Specifically, we introduce a teacher model, coming from the average weights of the student models over the training steps. Then we design a consistency loss function to make the prediction distribution of the student models over adversarial examples consistent with that of the teacher model over clean samples. Experiments show that our proposed method can effectively alleviate robust overfitting and improve the robustness of DNN models against common adversarial attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2022.

Builds on

46 of 58 references.

References · 46

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  8. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  9. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  10. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  11. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  12. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
34 more
  1. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  2. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  3. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  4. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  5. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
  6. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 918
  7. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  8. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  9. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
  10. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  11. 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
  12. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  13. 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
  14. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  15. 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 382
  16. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  17. 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
  18. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  19. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
  20. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  21. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  22. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 181
  23. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
  24. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162
  25. 2014Towards Deep Neural Network Architectures Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 146
  26. 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
  27. 2018There Are Many Consistent Explanations of Unlabeled Data: Why You Should Averagecited by 82
  28. 2019Adversarially Robust Generalization Just Requires More Unlabeled Datacited by 75
  29. 2020On the Loss Landscape of Adversarial Training: Identifying Challenges and How to Overcome Themcited by 59
  30. 2021Relating Adversarially Robust Generalization to Flat Minimacited by 57
  31. 2021Exploring Memorization in Adversarial Trainingcited by 55
  32. 2021Consistency Regularization for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 42
  33. 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Geometry-Aware Instance-Reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 12
  34. 2021Adversarial Training Makes Weight Loss Landscape Sharper in Logistic Regressioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.