mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Grounded Intuition of GPT-Vision's Abilities with Scientific Images

arXiv 2311.02069 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

GPT-Vision has impressed us on a range of vision-language tasks, but it comes with the familiar new challenge: we have little idea of its capabilities and limitations. In our study, we formalize a process that many have instinctively been trying already to develop "grounded intuition" of this new model. Inspired by the recent movement away from benchmarking in favor of example-driven qualitative evaluation, we draw upon grounded theory and thematic analysis in social science and human-computer interaction to establish a rigorous framework for qualitative evaluation in natural language processing. We use our technique to examine alt text generation for scientific figures, finding that GPT-Vision is particularly sensitive to prompting, counterfactual text in images, and relative spatial relationships. Our method and analysis aim to help researchers ramp up their own grounded intuitions of new models while exposing how GPT-Vision can be applied to make information more accessible.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2023.

Builds on

23 of 63 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  5. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
  6. 2023The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)cited by 677
  7. 2022News Summarization and Evaluation in the Era of GPT-3cited by 324
  8. 2021Symbolic Knowledge Distillation: from General Language Models to Commonsense Modelscited by 270
  9. 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
  10. 2023VisText: A Benchmark for Semantically Rich Chart Captioningcited by 111
  11. 2021A Statistical Analysis of Summarization Evaluation Metrics using Resampling Methodscited by 71
  12. 2023LLM-in-the-loop: Leveraging Large Language Model for Thematic Analysiscited by 70
11 more
  1. 2022Real or Fake Text?: Investigating Human Ability to Detect Boundaries Between Human-Written and Machine-Generated Textcited by 63
  2. 2019Giving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehensioncited by 51
  3. 2023Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Text Summarization with In-Context Learningcited by 44
  4. 2021Accessible Visualization via Natural Language Descriptions: A Four-Level Model of Semantic Contentcited by 38
  5. 2022Context Matters for Image Descriptions for Accessibility: Challenges for Referenceless Evaluation Metricscited by 18
  6. 2022Striking a Balance: Reader Takeaways and Preferences when Integrating Text and Chartscited by 17
  7. 2022A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Community-Collaborative Approaches to Computing Researchcited by 13
  8. 2022A Dataset of Alt Texts from HCI Publications: Analyses and Uses Towards Producing More Descriptive Alt Texts of Data Visualizations in Scientific Paperscited by 11
  9. 2023Kani: A Lightweight and Highly Hackable Framework for Building Language Model Applicationscited by 11
  10. 2023Rewriting the Script: Adapting Text Instructions for Voice Interactioncited by 5
  11. 2020Dynamic Weighted Matching with Heterogeneous Arrival and Departure Ratescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.