mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A New Central Limit Theorem for the Augmented IPW Estimator: Variance Inflation, Cross-Fit Covariance and Beyond

arXiv 2205.10198 ↗First posted 20 May 2022math.ST econ.EM stat.MEcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimation of the average treatment effect (ATE) is a central problem in causal inference. In recent times, inference for the ATE in the presence of high-dimensional covariates has been extensively studied. Among the diverse approaches that have been proposed, augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) with cross-fitting has emerged a popular choice in practice. In this work, we study this cross-fit AIPW estimator under well-specified outcome regression and propensity score models in a high-dimensional regime where the number of features and samples are both large and comparable. Under assumptions on the covariate distribution, we establish a new central limit theorem for the suitably scaled cross-fit AIPW that applies without any sparsity assumptions on the underlying high-dimensional parameters. Our CLT uncovers two crucial phenomena among others: (i) the AIPW exhibits a substantial variance inflation that can be precisely quantified in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio and other problem parameters, (ii) the asymptotic covariance between the pre-cross-fit estimators is non-negligible even on the root-n scale. These findings are strikingly different from their classical counterparts. On the technical front, our work utilizes a novel interplay between three distinct tools--approximate message passing theory, the theory of deterministic equivalents, and the leave-one-out approach. We believe our proof techniques should be useful for analyzing other two-stage estimators in this high-dimensional regime. Finally, we complement our theoretical results with simulations that demonstrate both the finite sample efficacy of our CLT and its robustness to our assumptions.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 122 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.

Builds on

33 of 122 references.

References · 33

  1. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
  2. 2022Semiparametric doubly robust targeted double machine learning: a reviewcited by 129
  3. 2015Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithmscited by 128
  4. 2020Spectral Methods for Data Science: A Statistical Perspectivecited by 111
  5. 2019A Model of Double Descent for High-dimensional Binary Linear Classificationcited by 81
  6. 2022Universality of empirical risk minimizationcited by 73
  7. 2016Approximate Residual Balancing: De-Biased Inference of Average Treatment Effects in High Dimensionscited by 50
  8. 2020Precise Statistical Analysis of Classification Accuracies for Adversarial Trainingcited by 49
  9. 2021A unifying tutorial on Approximate Message Passingcited by 49
  10. 2018The phase transition for the existence of the maximum likelihood estimate in high-dimensional logistic regressioncited by 45
  11. 2020A Precise High-Dimensional Asymptotic Theory for Boosting and Minimum-ℓ1-Norm Interpolated Classifierscited by 44
  12. 2020The Lasso with general Gaussian designs with applications to hypothesis testingcited by 40
21 more
  1. 2013A framework to characterize performance of LASSO algorithmscited by 38
  2. 2013Robust Inference on Average Treatment Effects with Possibly More Covariates than Observationscited by 38
  3. 2020On the role of surrogates in the efficient estimation of treatment effects with limited outcome datacited by 36
  4. 2019The generalization error of max-margin linear classifiers: Benign overfitting and high dimensional asymptotics in the overparametrized regimecited by 27
  5. 2017The Likelihood Ratio Test in High-Dimensional Logistic Regression Is Asymptotically a Rescaled Chi-Squarecited by 15
  6. 2017Regularized calibrated estimation of propensity scores with model misspecification and high-dimensional datacited by 15
  7. 2019A unifying approach for doubly-robust ℓ1 regularized estimation of causal contrastscited by 15
  8. 2019Consistent Risk Estimation in Moderately High-Dimensional Linear Regressioncited by 14
  9. 2019Algorithmic Analysis and Statistical Estimation of SLOPE via Approximate Message Passingcited by 14
  10. 2020Out-of-sample error estimate for robust M-estimators with convex penaltycited by 13
  11. 2020Debiased Inverse Propensity Score Weighting for Estimation of Average Treatment Effects with High-Dimensional Confounderscited by 11
  12. 2018A scalable estimate of the extra-sample prediction error via approximate leave-one-outcited by 10
  13. 2021Sharp global convergence guarantees for iterative nonconvex optimization: A Gaussian process perspectivecited by 10
  14. 2019Sparsity Double Robust Inference of Average Treatment Effectscited by 7
  15. 2018Approximate Leave-One-Out for High-Dimensional Non-Differentiable Learning Problemscited by 6
  16. 2021Asymptotic normality of robust M-estimators with convex penaltycited by 5
  17. 2021Minimum ℓ1-norm interpolators: Precise asymptotics and multiple descentcited by 5
  18. 2022Observable adjustments in single-index models for regularized M-estimatorscited by 5
  19. 2020High-dimensional Model-assisted Inference for Local Average Treatment Effects with Instrumental Variablescited by 2
  20. 2022Explaining Practical Differences Between Treatment Effect Estimators with High Dimensional Asymptoticscited by 2
  21. 2014Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weightingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

5 papers.