A scalable estimate of the extra-sample prediction error via approximate leave-one-out
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The paper considers the problem of out-of-sample risk estimation under the high dimensional settings where standard techniques such as K-fold cross validation suffer from large biases. Motivated by the low bias of the leave-one-out cross validation (LO) method, we propose a computationally efficient closed-form approximate leave-one-out formula (ALO) for a large class of regularized estimators. Given the regularized estimate, calculating ALO requires minor computational overhead. With minor assumptions about the data generating process, we obtain a finite-sample upper bound for |LO - ALO|. Our theoretical analysis illustrates that |LO - ALO| rightarrow 0 with overwhelming probability, when n,p rightarrow ∞, where the dimension p of the feature vectors may be comparable with or even greater than the number of observations, n. Despite the high-dimensionality of the problem, our theoretical results do not require any sparsity assumption on the vector of regression coefficients. Our extensive numerical experiments show that |LO - ALO| decreases as n,p increase, revealing the excellent finite sample performance of ALO. We further illustrate the usefulness of our proposed out-of-sample risk estimation method by an example of real recordings from spatially sensitive neurons (grid cells) in the medial entorhinal cortex of a rat.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 273
- 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labelscited by 223
- 2025MAGIC: Near-Optimal Data Attribution for Deep Learningcited by 20
- 2021Can we globally optimize cross-validation loss? Quasiconvexity in ridge regressioncited by 8
- 2022A New Central Limit Theorem for the Augmented IPW Estimator: Variance Inflation, Cross-Fit Covariance and Beyondcited by 5
- 2024ROTI-GCV: Generalized Cross-Validation for right-ROTationally Invariant Datacited by 4
- 2025Rescaled Influence Functions: Accurate Data Attribution in High Dimensioncited by 3
- 2025GUARD: Guided Unlearning and Retention via Data Attribution for Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Imperfect Influence, Preserved Rankings: A Theory of TRAK for Data Attributioncited by 1
- 2025On the Accuracy of Newton Step and Influence Function Data Attributionscited by 0
- 2026Imperfect Influence, Preserved Rankings: A Theory of TRAK for Data Attribution1 Feb 2026
- 2025On the Accuracy of Newton Step and Influence Function Data Attributions14 Dec 2025
- 2025GUARD: Guided Unlearning and Retention via Data Attribution for Large Language Models12 Jun 2025
- 2025Rescaled Influence Functions: Accurate Data Attribution in High Dimension7 Jun 2025
- 2025MAGIC: Near-Optimal Data Attribution for Deep Learning23 Apr 2025
- 2024ROTI-GCV: Generalized Cross-Validation for right-ROTationally Invariant Data17 Jun 2024
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scale24 Mar 2023
- 2022A New Central Limit Theorem for the Augmented IPW Estimator: Variance Inflation, Cross-Fit Covariance and Beyond20 May 2022
- 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels26 Aug 2021
- 2021Can we globally optimize cross-validation loss? Quasiconvexity in ridge regression19 Jul 2021