mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Minimum ℓ1-norm interpolators: Precise asymptotics and multiple descent

arXiv 2110.09502 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2021math.ST cs.IT cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An evolving line of machine learning works observe empirical evidence that suggests interpolating estimators -- the ones that achieve zero training error -- may not necessarily be harmful. This paper pursues theoretical understanding for an important type of interpolators: the minimum ℓ1-norm interpolator, which is motivated by the observation that several learning algorithms favor low ℓ1-norm solutions in the over-parameterized regime. Concretely, we consider the noisy sparse regression model under Gaussian design, focusing on linear sparsity and high-dimensional asymptotics (so that both the number of features and the sparsity level scale proportionally with the sample size). We observe, and provide rigorous theoretical justification for, a curious multi-descent phenomenon; that is, the generalization risk of the minimum ℓ1-norm interpolator undergoes multiple (and possibly more than two) phases of descent and ascent as one increases the model capacity. This phenomenon stems from the special structure of the minimum ℓ1-norm interpolator as well as the delicate interplay between the over-parameterized ratio and the sparsity, thus unveiling a fundamental distinction in geometry from the minimum ℓ2-norm interpolator. Our finding is built upon an exact characterization of the risk behavior, which is governed by a system of two non-linear equations with two unknowns.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2021.

Builds on

22 of 81 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
  2. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
  3. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 413
  4. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 342
  5. 2021Deep learning: a statistical viewpointcited by 240
  6. 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
  7. 2021Fit without fear: remarkable mathematical phenomena of deep learning through the prism of interpolationcited by 132
  8. 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 109
  9. 2020Triple descent and the two kinds of overfitting: Where & why do they appear?cited by 65
  10. 2021A unifying tutorial on Approximate Message Passingcited by 50
  11. 2020Multiple Descent: Design Your Own Generalization Curvecited by 45
  12. 2020A Precise High-Dimensional Asymptotic Theory for Boosting and Minimum-ℓ1-Norm Interpolated Classifierscited by 44
10 more
  1. 2017Estimation of Low-Rank Matrices via Approximate Message Passingcited by 41
  2. 2013A framework to characterize performance of LASSO algorithmscited by 40
  3. 2020The Lasso with general Gaussian designs with applications to hypothesis testingcited by 40
  4. 2019Understanding overfitting peaks in generalization error: Analytical risk curves for l2 and l1 penalized interpolationcited by 23
  5. 2016Finite Sample Analysis of Approximate Message Passing Algorithmscited by 20
  6. 2020On the robustness of minimum norm interpolators and regularized empirical risk minimizerscited by 19
  7. 2021Approximate Message Passing for orthogonally invariant ensembles: Multivariate non-linearities and spectral initializationcited by 18
  8. 2021Local convexity of the TAP free energy and AMP convergence for Z2-synchronizationcited by 15
  9. 2019Algorithmic Analysis and Statistical Estimation of SLOPE via Approximate Message Passingcited by 14
  10. 2020Overfitting Can Be Harmless for Basis Pursuit, But Only to a Degreecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

7 papers.