mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

DDDM: a Brain-Inspired Framework for Robust Classification

arXiv 2205.10117 ↗First posted 1 May 2022cs.NE cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite their outstanding performance in a broad spectrum of real-world tasks, deep artificial neural networks are sensitive to input noises, particularly adversarial perturbations. On the contrary, human and animal brains are much less vulnerable. In contrast to the one-shot inference performed by most deep neural networks, the brain often solves decision-making with an evidence accumulation mechanism that may trade time for accuracy when facing noisy inputs. The mechanism is well described by the Drift-Diffusion Model (DDM). In the DDM, decision-making is modeled as a process in which noisy evidence is accumulated toward a threshold. Drawing inspiration from the DDM, we propose the Dropout-based Drift-Diffusion Model (DDDM) that combines test-phase dropout and the DDM for improving the robustness for arbitrary neural networks. The dropouts create temporally uncorrelated noises in the network that counter perturbations, while the evidence accumulation mechanism guarantees a reasonable decision accuracy. Neural networks enhanced with the DDDM tested in image, speech, and text classification tasks all significantly outperform their native counterparts, demonstrating the DDDM as a task-agnostic defense against adversarial attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2022.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,321
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,336
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,379
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,992
  5. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,316
  6. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,265
  7. 2018Speech Commands: A Dataset for Limited-Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 748
  8. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 684
  9. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 519
  10. 2015Deep Speech 2: End-to-End Speech Recognition in English and Mandarincited by 449
  11. 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 381
  12. 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 272
4 more
  1. 2018Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defensecited by 171
  2. 2019Imperceptible, Robust, and Targeted Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 124
  3. 2018Adversarial Examples that Fool both Computer Vision and Time-Limited Humanscited by 73
  4. 2020Fast Differentiable Clipping-Aware Normalization and Rescalingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Divide-and-Conquer: Towards Generalizable Amortized Bayesian Inference for the Drift Diffusion Model
  2. 2025Diffusion Models are Robust Pretrainers
  3. 2022Enhancing Diffusion-Based Image Synthesis with Robust Classifier Guidance
  4. 2023Robust Classification via a Single Diffusion Model
  5. 2026Blind denoising diffusion models and the blessings of dimensionality
  6. 2026Expanding the Role of Diffusion Models for Robust Classifier Training
  7. 2024ProTIP: Probabilistic Robustness Verification on Text-to-Image Diffusion Models against Stochastic Perturbation
  8. 2026Beyond the Bidirectional Promise: Re-evaluating the Robustness of Diffusion Language Models