mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Lost in Compression: the Impact of Lossy Image Compression on Variable Size Object Detection within Infrared Imagery

arXiv 2205.08002 ↗First posted 16 May 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Lossy image compression strategies allow for more efficient storage and transmission of data by encoding data to a reduced form. This is essential enable training with larger datasets on less storage-equipped environments. However, such compression can cause severe decline in performance of deep Convolution Neural Network (CNN) architectures even when mild compression is applied and the resulting compressed imagery is visually identical. In this work, we apply the lossy JPEG compression method with six discrete levels of increasing compression {95, 75, 50, 15, 10, 5} to infrared band (thermal) imagery. Our study quantitatively evaluates the affect that increasing levels of lossy compression has upon the performance of characteristically diverse object detection architectures (Cascade-RCNN, FSAF and Deformable DETR) with respect to varying sizes of objects present in the dataset. When training and evaluating on uncompressed data as a baseline, we achieve maximal mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.823 with Cascade R-CNN across the FLIR dataset, outperforming prior work. The impact of the lossy compression is more extreme at higher compression levels (15, 10, 5) across all three CNN architectures. However, re-training models on lossy compressed imagery notably ameliorated performances for all three CNN models with an average increment of ~76% (at higher compression level 5). Additionally, we demonstrate the relative sensitivity of differing object areas {tiny, small, medium, large} with respect to the compression level. We show that tiny and small objects are more sensitive to compression than medium and large objects. Overall, Cascade R-CNN attains the maximal mAP across most of the object area categories.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2022.

Builds on

20 of 52 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  6. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  7. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  8. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  9. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  10. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
  11. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
  12. 2017Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networkscited by 707
8 more
  1. 2019Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 428
  2. 2019Feature Selective Anchor-Free Module for Single-Shot Object Detectioncited by 139
  3. 2016Understanding How Image Quality Affects Deep Neural Networkscited by 118
  4. 2016Multispectral Deep Neural Networks for Pedestrian Detectioncited by 82
  5. 2019Borrow from Anywhere: Pseudo Multi-modal Object Detection in Thermal Imagerycited by 38
  6. 2021SSTN: Self-Supervised Domain Adaptation Thermal Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 23
  7. 2020On the Impact of Lossy Image and Video Compression on the Performance of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Architecturescited by 11
  8. 2021Operationalizing Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for Prohibited Object Detection in X-Ray Imagerycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.