Data Quality Matters: Quantifying Image Quality Impact on Machine Learning Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Precise perception of the environment is essential in highly automated driving systems, which rely on machine learning tasks such as object detection and segmentation. Compression of sensor data is commonly used for data handling, while virtualization is used for hardware-in-the-loop validation. Both methods can alter sensor data and degrade model performance. This necessitates a systematic approach to quantifying image validity. This paper presents a four-step framework to evaluate the impact of image modifications on machine learning tasks. First, a dataset with modified images is prepared to ensure one-to-one matching image pairs, enabling measurement of deviations resulting from compression and virtualization. Second, image deviations are quantified by comparing the effects of compression and virtualization against original camera-based sensor data. Third, the performance of state-of-the-art object detection models is analyzed to determine how altered input data affects perception tasks, including bounding box accuracy and reliability. Finally, a correlation analysis is performed to identify relationships between image quality and model performance. As a result, the LPIPS metric achieves the highest correlation between image deviation and machine learning performance across all evaluated machine learning tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.
Builds on
10 of 22 references.
References · 10
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
- 2020Taming Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 3,253
- 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,351
- 2020Virtual KITTI 2cited by 353
- 2016Virtual Worlds as Proxy for Multi-Object Tracking Analysiscited by 341
- 2017Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Studycited by 267
- 2022Lost in Compression: the Impact of Lossy Image Compression on Variable Size Object Detection within Infrared Imagerycited by 6
- 2023Focus on the Challenges: Analysis of a User-friendly Data Search Approach with CLIP in the Automotive Domaincited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Point Cloud Recombination: Systematic Real Data Augmentation Using Robotic Targets for LiDAR Perception Validationcited by 1
- 2025A Data-Centric Perspective on the Influence of Image Data Quality in Machine Learning Modelscited by 0
- 2025NovisVQ: A Streaming Convolutional Neural Network for No-Reference Opinion-Unaware Frame Quality Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026From Big Data to Fast Data: Towards High-Quality Datasets for Machine Learning Applications from Closed-Loop Data Collectioncited by 0
- 2026SkyEV: RGB-Event UAV detection and tracking dataset and baselinecited by 0
- 2026SkyEV: RGB-Event UAV detection and tracking dataset and baseline21 Jul 2026
- 2026From Big Data to Fast Data: Towards High-Quality Datasets for Machine Learning Applications from Closed-Loop Data Collection31 Mar 2026
- 2025NovisVQ: A Streaming Convolutional Neural Network for No-Reference Opinion-Unaware Frame Quality Assessment6 Nov 2025
- 2025A Data-Centric Perspective on the Influence of Image Data Quality in Machine Learning Models29 Sep 2025
- 2025Point Cloud Recombination: Systematic Real Data Augmentation Using Robotic Targets for LiDAR Perception Validation5 May 2025