mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Heavy-Tail Phenomenon in Decentralized SGD

arXiv 2205.06689 ↗First posted 13 May 2022stat.ML cs.LG math.OCcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent theoretical studies have shown that heavy-tails can emerge in stochastic optimization due to `multiplicative noise', even under surprisingly simple settings, such as linear regression with Gaussian data. While these studies have uncovered several interesting phenomena, they consider conventional stochastic optimization problems, which exclude decentralized settings that naturally arise in modern machine learning applications. In this paper, we study the emergence of heavy-tails in decentralized stochastic gradient descent (DE-SGD), and investigate the effect of decentralization on the tail behavior. We first show that, when the loss function at each computational node is twice continuously differentiable and strongly convex outside a compact region, the law of the DE-SGD iterates converges to a distribution with polynomially decaying (heavy) tails. To have a more explicit control on the tail exponent, we then consider the case where the loss at each node is a quadratic, and show that the tail-index can be estimated as a function of the step-size, batch-size, and the topological properties of the network of the computational nodes. Then, we provide theoretical and empirical results showing that DE-SGD has heavier tails than centralized SGD. We also compare DE-SGD to disconnected SGD where nodes distribute the data but do not communicate. Our theory uncovers an interesting interplay between the tails and the network structure: we identify two regimes of parameters (stepsize and network size), where DE-SGD can have lighter or heavier tails than disconnected SGD depending on the regime. Finally, to support our theoretical results, we provide numerical experiments conducted on both synthetic data and neural networks.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2022.

Builds on

19 of 49 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
  3. 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 502
  4. 2019A Tail-Index Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Noise in Deep Neural Networkscited by 214
  5. 2013On the Convergence of Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 159
  6. 2020The Heavy-Tail Phenomenon in SGDcited by 124
  7. 2019Traditional and Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization in Neural Network Modelscited by 105
  8. 2020Hausdorff Dimension, Heavy Tails, and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 62
  9. 2021Exponential Graph is Provably Efficient for Decentralized Deep Trainingcited by 56
  10. 2020An improved convergence analysis for decentralized online stochastic non-convex optimizationcited by 53
  11. 2019Heavy-Tailed Universality Predicts Trends in Test Accuracies for Very Large Pre-Trained Deep Neural Networkscited by 44
  12. 2021Heavy Tails in SGD and Compressibility of Overparametrized Neural Networkscited by 44
7 more
  1. 2019On the Heavy-Tailed Theory of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Deep Neural Networkscited by 43
  2. 2019Non-Gaussianity of Stochastic Gradient Noisecited by 22
  3. 2020Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics and Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 19
  4. 2021BlueFog: Make Decentralized Algorithms Practical for Optimization and Deep Learningcited by 16
  5. 2019An Accelerated Decentralized Stochastic Proximal Algorithm for Finite Sumscited by 10
  6. 2019Asymptotic Network Independence in Distributed Stochastic Optimization for Machine Learningcited by 9
  7. 2019Robust Distributed Accelerated Stochastic Gradient Methods for Multi-Agent Networkscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.