mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exposing and Correcting the Gender Bias in Image Captioning Datasets and Models

arXiv 1912.00578 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2019cs.CVcited by 36

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The task of image captioning implicitly involves gender identification. However, due to the gender bias in data, gender identification by an image captioning model suffers. Also, the gender-activity bias, owing to the word-by-word prediction, influences other words in the caption prediction, resulting in the well-known problem of label bias. In this work, we investigate gender bias in the COCO captioning dataset and show that it engenders not only from the statistical distribution of genders with contexts but also from the flawed annotation by the human annotators. We look at the issues created by this bias in the trained models. We propose a technique to get rid of the bias by splitting the task into 2 subtasks: gender-neutral image captioning and gender classification. By this decoupling, the gender-context influence can be eradicated. We train the gender-neutral image captioning model, which gives comparable results to a gendered model even when evaluating against a dataset that possesses a similar bias as the training data. Interestingly, the predictions by this model on images with no humans, are also visibly different from the one trained on gendered captions. We train gender classifiers using the available bounding box and mask-based annotations for the person in the image. This allows us to get rid of the context and focus on the person to predict the gender. By substituting the genders into the gender-neutral captions, we get the final gendered predictions. Our predictions achieve similar performance to a model trained with gender, and at the same time are devoid of gender bias. Finally, our main result is that on an anti-stereotypical dataset, our model outperforms a popular image captioning model which is trained with gender.

Key facts. Cited by 36 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 10; 2023: 8; 2024: 11; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

36 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2022DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 230
  3. 2021Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioningcited by 108
  4. 2022Vision Models Are More Robust And Fair When Pretrained On Uncurated Images Without Supervisioncited by 80
  5. 2022Theories of "Gender" in NLP Bias Researchcited by 62
  6. 2024Examining Gender and Racial Bias in Large Vision-Language Models Using a Novel Dataset of Parallel Imagescited by 55
  7. 2024Visual Haystacks: A Vision-Centric Needle-In-A-Haystack Benchmarkcited by 55
  8. 2021Worst of Both Worlds: Biases Compound in Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Modelscited by 52
  9. 2023Uncurated Image-Text Datasets: Shedding Light on Demographic Biascited by 52
  10. 2022MAP: Multimodal Uncertainty-Aware Vision-Language Pre-training Modelcited by 41
  11. 2022Gender Artifacts in Visual Datasetscited by 38
  12. 2022Measuring Representational Harms in Image Captioningcited by 36
24 more
  1. 2025Generate, but Verify: Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models with Retrospective Resamplingcited by 33
  2. 2024GenderBias-VL: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Vision Language Models via Counterfactual Probingcited by 31
  3. 2022Underspecification in Scene Description-to-Depiction Taskscited by 30
  4. 2024Identifying Implicit Social Biases in Vision-Language Modelscited by 27
  5. 2023Survey of Social Bias in Vision-Language Modelscited by 26
  6. 2022Fairness Indicators for Systematic Assessments of Visual Feature Extractorscited by 24
  7. 2023MultiModal Bias: Introducing a Framework for Stereotypical Bias Assessment beyond Gender and Race in Vision Language Modelscited by 23
  8. 2023Model-Agnostic Gender Debiased Image Captioningcited by 17
  9. 2024BendVLM: Test-Time Debiasing of Vision-Language Embeddingscited by 17
  10. 2024DiffusionPID: Interpreting Diffusion via Partial Information Decompositioncited by 16
  11. 2024Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 13
  12. 2024A Unified Framework and Dataset for Assessing Societal Bias in Vision-Language Modelscited by 11
  13. 2023Adventures of Trustworthy Vision-Language Models: A Surveycited by 10
  14. 2024Analyzing Quality, Bias, and Performance in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 9
  15. 2022What's in a Caption? Dataset-Specific Linguistic Diversity and Its Effect on Visual Description Models and Metricscited by 6
  16. 2022Distribution Aware Metrics for Conditional Natural Language Generationcited by 6
  17. 2023Run Like a Girl! Sports-Related Gender Bias in Language and Visioncited by 6
  18. 2023Evaluating Bias and Fairness in Gender-Neutral Pretrained Vision-and-Language Modelscited by 6
  19. 2023Mitigating Bias in Visual Transformers via Targeted Alignmentcited by 4
  20. 2025From Charts to Fair Narratives: Uncovering and Mitigating Geo-Economic Biases in Chart-to-Textcited by 2
  21. 2024More is Less? A Simulation-Based Approach to Dynamic Interactions between Biases in Multimodal Modelscited by 1
  22. 2025Automated Evaluation of Gender Bias Across 13 Large Multimodal Modelscited by 1
  23. 2024Think Before You Act: A Two-Stage Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias Towards Vision-Language Taskscited by 0
  24. 2026Investigating Disability Representations in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 0